Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature

Authors

Doug Axe
Douglas Axe
Photo by Nathan Jacobson, © Discovery Institute (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Günter Bechly
Bespectacled Michael Behe in Green Shirt, Coat, and Cap
Michael J. Behe
Photo courtesy of Celeste Behe.
David Berlinski
David Berlinski
Eric Cassell
David Coppedge
Photo provided by David Coppedge.
William A. Dembski
Image provided by Bill Dembski
Michael Denton
Michael Flannery
Ann Gauger
Howard Glicksman
Guillermo Gonzalez at Garden of the Gods, July 2022
Guillermo Gonzalez
Photo by Nathan Jacobson, © Discovery Institute (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Eric Hedin
Cornelius Hunter
Cornelius G. Hunter
Stephen J. Iacoboni
Photo courtesy of Stephen Iacoboni
David Klinghoffer in 2021
David Klinghoffer
Photo by Casey Sernaqué
Carl Linnaeus
Photo licensed via Adobe Stock
Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig
Photo provided by Katja Deborah Lönnig
Casey Luskin
Casey Luskin
Photo by Nathan Jacobson, © Discovery Institute (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Andrew McDiarmid
Photo by Casey Sernaqué
Jonathan McLatchie
Stephen C. Meyer
Brian Miller
Walter Myers III
Paul Nelson at Car Museum
Paul Nelson
Photo by Nathan Jacobson for Discovery Institute (CC BY)
Denyse O’Leary
Emily Reeves
Emily Sandico
Photo provided by Emily Sandico
Granville Sewell
Robert Shedinger
Geoffrey Simmons
Photo by Nathan Jacobson for Discovery Institute (CC-BY)
Wesley J. Smith
Photo by Gary Fong, Used by Permission, All Rights Reserved
Rob Stadler
Neil Thomas
Jonathan Wells
John G. West
Photo by Chris Morgan, © Discovery Institute
Daniel Witt
Photo provided by Daniel Witt.
Jonathan Witt

Science and Culture Today | Page 1150 | Discovering Design in Nature

Type
post
Author
Ann Gauger
Date
October 11, 2011
Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, , , , , , , ,

Corticosteroid Receptors in Vertebrates: Luck or Design?

Ann Gauger
October 11, 2011
Evolution, Intelligent Design
1
Based on new research by Joseph Thornton and Sean Carroll and colleagues, it increasingly appears that either we are very lucky or we are intelligently designed. Read More ›
Type
post
Author
Casey Luskin
Date
October 10, 2011
Categories
Evolution
Science Education
Tagged
, , , , , ,

(Not) Making the Grade: An Evaluation of 22 Recent Biology Textbooks and Their Use of Selected Icons of Evolution

Casey Luskin
October 10, 2011
Evolution, Science Education
7
Unfortunately, as this review has made clear, biology textbooks have a long way to go. Parents, students and educators who seek accuracy and objectivity in evolution-education will have to continue to be a "royal pain in the fanny" of textbook publishers. Read More ›
Type
post
Author
David Klinghoffer
Date
October 10, 2011
Categories
Bioethics
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, , , , , , ,

Dante on the “Angelic Butterfly”

David Klinghoffer
October 10, 2011
Bioethics, Biology, Intelligent Design
1
In the matter of this particular image, seeing humans caught in a transformative process like the one enacted by caterpillars and butterflies, Nabokov was scooped by Dante in the Divine Comedy. Read More ›
mSignatureHeader
Signature in the Cell hardback
Type
post
Author
Stephen C. Meyer
Date
October 9, 2011
Categories
Intelligent Design
Life Sciences
Tagged
, , , , , , ,

Of Molecules and (Straw) Men: Stephen Meyer Responds to Dennis Venema’s Review of Signature in the Cell

Stephen C. Meyer
October 9, 2011
Intelligent Design, Life Sciences
46
While my book presents intelligent design as an alternative to chemical evolutionary theory, Venema critiques it as if it had presented a critique of neo-Darwinism — i.e., biological evolutionary theory. Read More ›
common-descent-stockpack-adobe-stock-1408682736-stockpack-adobestock
common descent
Image Credit: Sung Hwan Kim - Adobe Stock
Type
post
Author
Jonathan McLatchie
Date
October 7, 2011
Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fact-Checking Wikipedia on Common Descent: The Evidence from Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry

Jonathan McLatchie
October 7, 2011
Biochemistry, Evolution, Genetics
24
It is important, in evaluating these arguments, that one consider all the evidence: not just the evidence that is consistent. It seems to me that when this is done, the arguments for common descent -- certainly in its universal sense -- are, at best, inconclusive. Read More ›
Type
post
Author
Michael Behe
Date
October 7, 2011
Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, , , , , , ,

The English Translation of “New Work by Thornton’s Group”

Michael Behe
October 7, 2011
Evolution
1
Turning a protein shaped to do one particular job into a protein that does just a slightly different job (which most biologists, including myself, had thought would be as easy as pie) turned out to be much more difficult than expected. Read More ›
Type
post
Author
Jonathan Wells
Date
October 6, 2011
Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, , , , , , ,

The Receding Myth of “Junk DNA”

Jonathan Wells
October 6, 2011
Evolution, Genetics
1
Since I published The Myth of Junk DNA in May, there has been no response from the pro-Darwin authors I criticized in it. On September 23, 2011, however, John Farrell reviewed it for the Huffington Post. Read More ›

© Discovery Institute