In Case You Missed It: Oxford University Seeks Mathemagician

_{Anika Smith
May 6, 2011

Evolution

1}

Biologic Institute Director Douglas Axe gives us his take on Oxford University's search for a mathemagician to support the claims of Darwin and Dawkins with, you know, actual math. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
May 6, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, News}

Charles Darwin, Theologian: Major New Article on Darwin’s Use of Theology in the Origin of Species

_{Science and Culture
May 6, 2011

Evolution

1}

A significant new article argues that Darwin used theology throughout the Origin of Species to argue for the truth of his theory of descent with modification by natural causes. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 5, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review}

Oxford University Admits Darwinism’s Shaky Math Foundation

_{David Klinghoffer
May 5, 2011

Evolution

1}

Maybe if we enter the figures again and push the "equals" button on our hand calculator just one more time, it will give a different answer. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 4, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Evolutionary Psychology
Tagged
, __k-review, E.O. Wilson}

E.O. Wilson Disavows His Own Kin Selection

_{Casey Luskin
May 4, 2011

Evolution, Evolutionary Psychology

8}

If human behavior evolved, why have humans essentially adopted virtually universal ethical systems? Read More ›

Concrete staircase with ramp accessibility

^{Type
post

Author
Anika Smith

Date
May 3, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __nedited, BioLogos, debates, Dissent from Darwinism, elitism, Henry F. (Fritz) Schaefer, Karl Giberson, natural selection, overconfidence, persuasion, Response to Criticism, theistic evolution, theory, William A. Dembski}

William Dembski on BioLogos and Theistic Evolution at Patheos

_{Anika Smith
May 3, 2011

Evolution, Faith & Science

4}

Dembski's point is that books like these sell ideas -- and that's actually a good thing, as long as the authors practice truth in advertising: Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 2, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Francis Collins, junk DNA}

Francis Collins’ Junk DNA Arguments Pushed Into Increasingly Small Gaps in Scientific Knowledge

_{Casey Luskin
May 2, 2011

Evolution, Faith & Science

12}

Francis Collins and Karl Giberson rely heavily on pseudogenes -- what they call "broken DNA" -- to argue for evolution, but increased discovery of function for pseudogenes means their argument is being pushed into increasingly smaller gaps. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
April 27, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Life Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review}

When Enzymes Don’t Lie

_{Science and Culture
April 27, 2011

Evolution, Life Sciences

1}

New research published in Bio-Complexity calls into question some fundamental assumptions of neo-Darwinian theory and enzyme evolution.

Primate Phylogenetics Researchers Swinging from Tree to Tree

_{Casey Luskin
April 26, 2011

Evolution, Human Origins and Anthropology

5}

Researchers trying to create a primate phylogenetic tree are finding it isn't as easy as they'd hoped. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 25, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, junk DNA, pseudogenes}

Et tu, Pseudogenes? Another Type of “Junk” DNA Betrays Darwinian Predictions

_{Casey Luskin
April 25, 2011

Evolution, Faith & Science

5}

Perhaps the mindset of Dawkins, Giberson, and Collins is setting us up to miss important biological functions of pseudogenes. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Robert L. Crowther, II

Date
April 19, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, junk DNA}

Is the Human Genome Garbage? Biologist Jonathan Wells Says No in New Book, The Myth of Junk DNA

_{Robert Crowther
April 19, 2011

Evolution

1}

A decade after his book challenged the Darwinian stories told to students and helped change textbooks in science classrooms around the country, Jonathan Wells is back to smash one of evolution's last remaining icons: the myth of junk DNA. Read More ›