Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
stockholm-syndrome-title
Image source: Discovery Institute.
Latest

How Stockholm Syndrome Christianity Hinders Scientific Progress

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Scientific Freedom
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

When Christians in science embrace scientific materialism, they mislead their fellow believers and hinder scientific progress. On a new episode of ID the Future, I conclude a two-part conversation about this problem with Dr. John West, author of the new book Stockholm Syndrome Christianity: Why Christian Leaders Are Failing and What We Can Do About It. The discussion focuses on how Stockholm Syndrome Christianity harms the scientific enterprise and what can be done to repair the damage.

In a nutshell, theistic evolution is the attempt to reconcile belief in God with the standard evolutionary account of life’s origins. In Part 1, Dr. West delved into the implications of theistic evolution and the historical roots of scientific materialism, culminating in a critique of Darwin’s influence on modern scientific thought. In Part 2, West describes three foundational biblical beliefs that have been corroded by theistic evolution. As an example of the theistic evolution perspective, West discusses the work of Dr. Francis Collins, arguably the most celebrated evangelical Christian scientist in America. In his bestselling book The Language of God, Collins proposed that God may have made evolution look random and undirected. West calls this poor theology but a brilliant tactic: “If you have that belief, well then you’re going to be a lot less offensive to the Darwinian materialist.” 

Unfortunately for Collins, The Language of God hasn’t aged well scientifically since its release a decade ago. West provides compelling examples. He also breaks down the BioLogos Foundation, a multi-year initiative co-founded by Collins that aims to convince evangelical Christians of the theistic evolutionary perspective. West concludes with the reminder that science thrives and advances with disagreement and vibrant, open debate: “If you don’t have the right to say the emperor has no clothes, if you don’t have the right to argue for dissenting views, you get static ideology, not science…You don’t actually progress into a better understanding of the world.”

Download the podcast or listen to it here. This is Part 2 of a two-part conversation. Listen to Part 1.

Dig Deeper

Andrew McDiarmid

Director of Podcasting and Senior Fellow
Andrew McDiarmid is Director of Podcasting and a Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute. He is also a contributing writer to Mind Matters. He produces ID The Future, a podcast from the Center for Science & Culture that presents the case, research, and implications of intelligent design and explores the debate over evolution. He writes and speaks regularly on the impact of technology on human living. Discovery Institute co-founder and bestselling author George Gilder has called McDiarmid “a scintillating venturer beyond the surfaces of technology to their hidden depths and meanings.” His work has appeared in numerous publications, including the Wall Street Journal, New York Post, Chicago Tribune, San Francisco Chronicle, Daily Wire, Real Clear Politics, Newsmax, The American Spectator, Technoskeptic Magazine, and elsewhere. In addition to his roles at Discovery Institute, he promotes his homeland as host of the Scottish culture and music podcast Simply Scottish. Andrew holds an MA in Teaching from Seattle Pacific University and a BA in English/Creative Writing from the University of Washington.
Benefiting from Science & Culture Today?
Support the Center for Science and Culture and ensure that we can continue to publish counter-cultural commentary and original reporting and analysis on scientific research, evolution, neuroscience, bioethics, and intelligent design.

© Discovery Institute