Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Sauropods
Photo: Skeletal Reconstruction of <I>Mamenchisaurus youngi</I>, though other sources speak of the very closely related <I>Omeisaurus</I>, in the Dinosaur Museum of Zigong, by Einar Fredriksen, CC BY-SA 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.
Latest

Günter Bechly on Life’s Sudden Information Explosions

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Paleontology
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

We are mourning the recent loss of our friend and colleague Günter Bechly. Günter was a world-class paleontologist and an inspiration to many for his learned insight into the fossil record and his brave rejection of Darwinian dogma. Today we’re sharing the second half of a two-part interview with Dr. Bechly originally recorded in 2018 with host Sarah Chaffee.

You’ve likely heard of the Cambrian explosion of animal life. But what about all the other geologically sudden explosions of biodiversity in the history of life on Earth? Dr. Bechly was co-author (with Stephen C. Meyer) of the chapter titled “The Fossil Record and Universal Common Ancestry” in the book Theistic Evolution: A Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Critique.  In this part of the conversation, Bechly moves on from the Cambrian explosion to discuss “life’s second ‘big bang.’” He then touches on other biological explosions, including the Avalon explosion, the Triassic explosion, the origin of flowering plants, and the origin of placental mammals. “There’s no reasonable way,” Bechly concludes, “to get from bacteria to mammals via evolutionary processes.”

Dr. Bechly goes on to express his reservations about the theory of universal common ancestry, the idea that all living things descend from a single common ancestor. While that is not a weakly supported idea, Bechly questions whether it is the best explanation for the diversity of life on Earth when all the data is taken into account. “Common ancestry only makes sense as an alternative explanation,” says Bechly, “if there is a viable naturalistic confirmation process that could explain the transition from ancestral species to descendant species, the origin of new body plans, new structures, new genes, new protein folds, and so on…The neo-Darwinian process is not viable.”

Download the podcast or listen to it here. This is Part 2 of a two-part conversation. Listen to Part 1

Dig Deeper

Click here to display content from YouTube.
Learn more in YouTube’s privacy policy.

Andrew McDiarmid

Director of Podcasting and Senior Fellow
Andrew McDiarmid is Director of Podcasting and a Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute. He is also a contributing writer to Mind Matters. He produces ID The Future, a podcast from the Center for Science & Culture that presents the case, research, and implications of intelligent design and explores the debate over evolution. He writes and speaks regularly on the impact of technology on human living. His work has appeared in numerous publications, including the New York Post, Houston Chronicle, The Daily Wire, San Francisco Chronicle, Real Clear Politics, Newsmax, The American Spectator, The Federalist, Technoskeptic Magazine, and elsewhere. In addition to his roles at Discovery Institute, he promotes his homeland as host of the Scottish culture and music podcast Simply Scottish. Andrew holds an MA in Teaching from Seattle Pacific University and a BA in English/Creative Writing from the University of Washington.
Benefiting from Science & Culture Today?
Support the Center for Science and Culture and ensure that we can continue to publish counter-cultural commentary and original reporting and analysis on scientific research, evolution, neuroscience, bioethics, and intelligent design.

© Discovery Institute