triggered-2048x1074 Type post Author Casey Luskin Date May 18, 2020 CategoriesScientific Freedom Tagged , "poor design", Andrew Moore, appendix, BioEssays, censorship, chance, coccyx, Darwinian evolution, Dave Speijer, Discovery Institute, Evolution News, Facebook, free speech, intelligent design, Jacques Monod, junk DNA, Karl Popper, Panda's Thumb, Paul Nelson, Signature in the Cell, sinuses, social media, Stephen Jay Gould, Stephen Meyer, The Design Inference, thermometer, vertebrate eye, whale pelvic bones What Triggered a Biology Journal to Demand Government Censorship of Intelligent Design Casey Luskin May 18, 2020 Scientific Freedom 20 The article is like a thermometer measuring a fever among evolutionists. Read More ›
andy-brunner-21063-unsplash 2 Type post Author Casey Luskin Date April 11, 2019 CategoriesBiologyEvolution Tagged , __k-review, "poor design", Adventures in Poor Taste, APOB, Arthur Hunt, chloroquine resistance, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian evolution, Discovery Institute, errors, Evolution News, Human Errors, John Harshman, John Jay College, Liu et al. (2014), Michael Behe, Michael Egnor, Nathan Lents, paranasal sinuses, Peaceful Science, PNAS, Polar Bear Seminar, polar bears, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Retraction Crisis, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), Shiping Liu, sinuses, The Edge of Evolution Polar Bear Seminar: On Retracting — and Not Retracting — Errors Casey Luskin April 11, 2019 Biology, Evolution 10 It was Nathan Lents himself who wrote, “I’ve made mistakes, some I caught, others someone else caught. I always correct it the best I can. That’s what honest people do.” Read More ›
Joshua Swamidass Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date September 21, 2018 CategoriesAnatomyBiologyIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, "poor design", evolution, Evolution News, Human Errors, intelligent design, maxillary sinus, Nathan Lents, neuroscience, paranasal sinuses, S. Joshua Swamidass, sinuses, terminology, Wall Street Journal Critic of Intelligent Design Acknowledges: “Bad Design” Arguments Don’t Work David Klinghoffer September 21, 2018 Anatomy, Biology, Intelligent Design 4 It’s good to be able to report progress. Read More ›
