Tag: Retraction Crisis | Page 2 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 11, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, "poor design", Adventures in Poor Taste, APOB, Arthur Hunt, chloroquine resistance, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian evolution, Discovery Institute, errors, Evolution News, Human Errors, John Harshman, John Jay College, Liu et al. (2014), Michael Behe, Michael Egnor, Nathan Lents, paranasal sinuses, Peaceful Science, PNAS, Polar Bear Seminar, polar bears, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Retraction Crisis, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), Shiping Liu, sinuses, The Edge of Evolution}

Polar Bear Seminar: On Retracting — and Not Retracting — Errors

_{Casey Luskin
April 11, 2019

Biology, Evolution

10}

It was Nathan Lents himself who wrote, “I’ve made mistakes, some I caught, others someone else caught. I always correct it the best I can. That’s what honest people do.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
December 12, 2017

Categories
Archaeology
Genetics
Human Origins and Anthropology
Paleontology
Tagged
, __nedited, "Out of Africa", Africa, Asia, Darwinism, Discover Magazine, discredited theories, fact check, fossil record, Homo sapiens, human origins, humans, hype, just-so stories, Levant, migration, paleoanthropology, Retraction Crisis, Science Magazine, timeline}

“It’s Official”: Textbook Wisdom on Human Origins Is Wrong!

_{Günter Bechly
December 12, 2017

Archaeology, Genetics, Human Origins and Anthropology, Paleontology

4}

I hardly dared to dream that, as an early Christmas present, 2017 would close with a final blow to the Out of Africa story. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 8, 2017

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, belief, bias, Brian Miller, DNA, intelligent design, Jack Szostak, materialism, monomers, Nature Chemistry, peptides, proteins, Retraction Crisis, Retraction Watch, RNA, RNA self-replication, Scientific American, Signature in the Cell, skepticism, Stephen Meyer}

Prominent Retraction Vindicates Stephen Meyer and Signature in the Cell

_{David Klinghoffer
December 8, 2017

Biology, Intelligent Design, Origin of Life

4}

Criticism suggested that Nobel laureate Jack Szostak and others were fast closing in on a solution to the origin-of-life problem with the “principle of RNA self-replication." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
December 7, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, beliefs, bias, blind, Harvard University, humans, Jack Szostak, Nature Chemistry, Nobel laureate, postdoc, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Retraction Crisis, Retraction Watch, RNA, scientists}

Retractions Show Scientists “Blinded” by Belief

_{Ann Gauger
December 7, 2017

Evolution

3}

Nobel laureate Jack Szostak has recently retracted a paper. This is a big deal because of who he is and because of where it was published. Read More ›

Police scientist investigates fake dollar bills and passports in criminal investigation unit, conceptual image

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 21, 2017

Categories
Bioethics
Evolution
Metascience
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __edited, activism, censorship, funding, Jonathan Wells, March for Science, National Institutes of Health, Research, research funding, Retraction Crisis, Zombie Science (book)}

What the March for Science Is Really About: Your Money

_{David Klinghoffer
April 21, 2017

Bioethics, Evolution, Metascience, Scientific Freedom

3}

More research funding sounds nice, but as Jonathan Wells explains, it does the search for truth no favors. Read More ›