Tag: ORfan genes

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
November 13, 2024

Categories
Botany
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, bacteria, bioinformatics, C. elegans, Discovery Institute, DNA, E. coli, evolution, evolutionary paradigm, fungi, genes, genomes, genomics, intelligent design, nucleotide sequences, ORfan genes, PLOS ONE, search engines}

ORFanID: An Online Search Engine for Identifying Orfan Genes

_{Jonathan McLatchie
November 13, 2024

Botany, Evolution, Intelligent Design

5}

The existence of such genes is surprising given the hypothesis of universal common descent. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Paul Nelson

Date
February 11, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, evolution, evolutionary mechanisms, genome, Human Errors, human genome, intelligent design, Nathan Lents, open reading frame, ORfan genes, orphan genes, undirected evolution, yeast}

Human Orphan Genes — Interesting YouTube Talk Tonight by Nathan Lents

_{Paul Nelson
February 11, 2021

Evolution

1}

A couple of years ago, Professor Lents became fascinated by orphan genes, and went looking for them in the human genome. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
March 20, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, bats, coding, common design, convergent evolution, Darwinian theory, Douglas Axe, evolution, homoplasy, intelligent design, mutations, ORfan genes, plagiarism, pseudogenes, Richard Wagner, S. Joshua Swamidass, skulls, testes, Washington University, whale evolution, whales, World War I}

Of Whales and Timescales

_{Science and Culture
March 20, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design

13}

The changes involved in adapting a generic mammalian template into a whale are certainly not all simple, independent, single-letter changes. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
March 16, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Adam and Eve, Adam and the Genome, alchemy, antifreeze protein, BioLogos, common ancestry, Darwin's Doubt, de novo genes, Dennis Venema, DNA, evolution, Genome Research, intelligent design, junk DNA, Michael Lynch, non-coding DNA, open reading frames, ORfan genes, proteins, Reviewing Adam and the Genome, RNA, Stephen Meyer}

Adam and the Genome and the Mysterious Origin of De Novo Genes

_{Science and Culture
March 16, 2018

Evolution, Genetics, Intelligent Design

5}

A final case where biologist Dennis Venema deals with evidence that is irrelevant to the existence of Adam and Eve is his claim about ORFan genes. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
July 18, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Adam and the Genome, biological information, BioLogos, de novo genes, Dennis Venema, Douglas Axe, evolution, François Jacob, intelligent design, nylon, nylonase, ORfan genes, Stephen Meyer, Susumu Ohno, theistic evolution}

Nylonase: Move On, Nothing to See Here, Says Theistic Evolutionist

_{Ann Gauger
July 18, 2017

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science

11}

The supposed sudden emergence of the enzyme nylonase has been a chief talking point for the power of evolution for many years. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 31, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Brian Miller, Douglas Axe, Mackenzie Presbyterian University, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, ORfan genes}

See It: Axe, Behe, Miller in São Paulo for the Launch of Discovery-Mackenzie

_{David Klinghoffer
May 31, 2017

Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

Wow, our colleagues from Brazil are brimming with energy. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Stephen C. Meyer

Date
October 7, 2013

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Paleontology
Tagged
, __nedited, abrupt appearance, assembly, begging the question, body plans, Darwin's Doubt, DNA, information, Meyer's Responses, morphology, ORfan genes, Response to Criticism}

To Build New Animals, No New Genetic Information Needed? More in Reply in Charles Marshall

_{Stephen C. Meyer
October 7, 2013

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Paleontology

17}

To rebut the central argument of Darwin's Doubt, Marshall must deny (or push from view) what we know about what new forms of animal life require as a condition of their existence. Read More ›