Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Topic

Judge John E. Jones

Brigham Young University

Look What They’re Teaching at Brigham Young University

In biology class, associate professor Jamie Jensen seeks to inculcate her students with Epicureanism. Read More ›

Ten Myths About Dover: #3, "Intelligent Design Has No Peer-Reviewed Research or Publications"

In the Kitzmiller v. Dover ruling, Judge Jones claimed that ID "has not generated peer-reviewed publications." Read More ›

Ten Myths About Dover: #4, "The Dover Ruling Refuted Intelligent Design"

On the opening day of the 2005 Dover trial, the plaintiffs' leadoff expert witness, noted anti-ID biologist Kenneth Miller. Read More ›

Ten Myths About Dover: #7 "The Dover Case Showed ID Is ‘Religious’ and a Form of ‘Creationism’"

ID arguments are scientific, and not religious, because they use the scientific method to make their claims. Read More ›

Ten Myths About Dover: #8, “Michael Behe Admitted that ID Is No More Scientific than Astrology”

Did Behe really concede that ID is no more scientific than astrology? No. Yet we see this myth repeated all over the Internet. Read More ›

Ten Years After the Dover Case, Judge Jones Misunderstands His Critics

Judge Jones directly ignored the most relevant precedent from the U.S. Supreme Court -- precedent directly applicable to the Dover case. Read More ›

Does the Kitzmiller v. Dover Ruling Show that Intelligent Design is Academically Substandard?

We affectionately call this the "Judge Jones Said It, I Believe It, That Settles It" approach to ID. Read More ›
Ronald_Reagan_Federal_Building_and_Courthouse_entry_Harrisburg_PA_Nov_10

Dover Revisited: With Beta-Globin Pseudogene Now Found to Be Functional, an Icon of the “Junk DNA” Argument Bites the Dust

It's been Exhibit A -- literally, offered as evidence in a famous court case -- for critics of ID who argue that our genome can't be a product of design. Read More ›

© Discovery Institute