Tag: critics | Page 2 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 4, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, biological origins, critics, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinism, intelligent design, Michael Behe, Ray Bohlin}

Biologist Raymond Bohlin on Behe’s Mousetrap: “This Collection Is a Treasure”

_{David Klinghoffer
December 4, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Says biologist Raymond Bohlin, the book is a "gift to anyone passionately interested in biological origins and the debate over Darwinism and design." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 30, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, articles, bacterial flagellum, biological systems, critics, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian mechanism, evidence, Finland, Heretic: One Scientist’s Journey from Darwin to Design, ID critics, Irreducible Complexity, Matti Leisola, Michael Behe}

Matti Leisola: Michael Behe “Opened My Eyes”

_{David Klinghoffer
November 30, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

To say that a writer "opened your eyes," and to something as profound as the design of life, is a fantastic tribute. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
November 28, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, biologists, critics, data, Eric Anderson, essays, evolution, ID the Future, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Lehigh University, Michael Behe, molecular machines, Science (journal)}

Podcast with Michael Behe: “You Can’t Deny the Data Forever”

_{Science and Culture
November 28, 2020

Biochemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

The Lehigh University biochemist addresses misconceptions about irreducible complexity, and responds to the claim that “molecular machines” is a misnomer. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 23, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, books, critics, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian theory, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Kenneth Miller, Larry Moran, Lehigh University, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Nature’s Destiny, Neo-Darwinism, Richard Lenski, University of Otago, worldview}

Praise for Behe’s Latest: “Facts Before Theory”

_{David Klinghoffer
November 23, 2020

Biology, Evolution

2}

Says Michael Denton, "The book represents a devastatingly brilliant unanswerable response to his Darwinian critics and to the whole Darwinian worldview." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 20, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, biological origins, critics, Darwinian mechanism, Darwinism, evidence, intelligent design, Kenneth Miller, Lehigh University, life, Michael Behe, molecular structure, Nature (journal), Paul Gross, primary literature, Science (journal), Sean Carroll, The Edge of Evolution, The New Criterion, webinar}

Does Behe Ignore Critics? Find Out in a Live Webinar Saturday

_{David Klinghoffer
November 20, 2020

Biochemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

One of the weirdly persistent themes in attacks on him by other biologists is that he "waves away" opposing interpretations. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
November 18, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, critics, evolution, ID the Future, intelligent design, Lehigh University, Michael Behe, New York Times, science journals}

Behe’s Latest Gives the Lie to Critics’ Accusation

_{Science and Culture
November 18, 2020

Biochemistry, Intelligent Design

1}

Michael Behe's pro-Darwin critics have jumped all over him. Some even claim he’s ignored their objections. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 17, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, Brazilian Academy of Sciences, critics, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian evolution, Darwinism, intelligent design, Marcos Eberlin, scientists, The Edge of Evolution}

Tomorrow: Behe Springs a Mousetrap on Darwin

_{David Klinghoffer
November 17, 2020

Biochemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

Biochemist Michael Behe has been conducting a decades-long independent scientific audit of the evidence for unguided Darwinian evolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 13, 2020

Categories
Biology
Cosmology
Intelligent Design
Physics
Tagged
, articles, critics, Darwin's Doubt, designer, events, fossil record, intelligent design, Nathan Jacobson, New York Times, online course, Research, Return of the God Hypothesis, scientific evidence, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, theism, universe, video, website}

Stephen Meyer Gets a Suitably Impressive New Website

_{David Klinghoffer
October 13, 2020

Biology, Cosmology, Intelligent Design, Physics

2}

By turning to physics and cosmology — the study of the universe and its origins — Meyer brings evidence not just for a designer but for a personal God. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
August 5, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, Bioscience, critics, Darwinists, disease, evolution, filmmaker, fossil record, Jackson Wheat, Jerry Coyne, Long Story Short, Neo-Darwinism, population genetics, poster child, scientists, The Conversation, whales, Wikipedia, YouTube videos}

Whales — Time to Put Evolution’s Exhausted “Poster Child” to Rest

_{David Klinghoffer
August 5, 2020

Biology, Evolution

3}

The argument about whales turns on two points: “Population genetics calculations say no,” and “New fossil find throws the series into disarray.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 13, 2020

Categories
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, Brian Miller, critics, Eric Anderson, Evolution and Intelligent Design in a Nutshell, ID the Future, information, intelligence, intelligent agents, intelligent design, Michael Keas, natural phenomena, Nature, podcast, Saturn}

Mistakes Our Critics Make: Information In and Information About

_{Science and Culture
July 13, 2020

Physical Sciences

1}

Is there information actually in Saturn’s rings, or is that information produced by intelligent agents studying Saturn’s rings? Read More ›