Tag: controversy

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
April 28, 2020

Categories
Medicine
Tagged
, __edited, “consensus science”, Anthony Fauci, anxiety, biologists, carpenter, CDC, China, controversy, COVID-19, Darwinists, depression, diabetes, economy, epidemiology, experts, herd immunity, malnutrition, Nathan Lents, New York City, NIH, obesity, pandemic, public health, scientists, stroke, suicide, Twitter, viruses, WHO, Wuhan}

Herd Immunity, Not Herd Mentality

_{Michael Egnor
April 28, 2020

Medicine

7}

The “field of public health” is complicit in the worst episode of scientific malfeasance in the 21st century. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 14, 2019

Categories
Science Education
Tagged
, __edited, classroom, controversy, debate, education, history, ID the Future, Michael Keas, podcast, Robert Crowther, science, teachers, Unbelievable}

Michael Keas: Improving Science Education by Understanding Science’s History

_{Science and Culture
July 14, 2019

Science Education

1}

A science historian advises teachers that “science is best taught as science is best practiced.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 4, 2018

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, controversy, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian theory, evolution, intelligent design, Lehigh University, life, Michael Behe, science, species}

Booklist on Behe’s Latest: “Bound to Be Controversial”

_{David Klinghoffer
December 4, 2018

Biochemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

The first pre-publication reviews of Michael Behe’s new book, Darwin Devolves, are starting to come in. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 15, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, author, Bruce Chapman, controversy, Darwinists, debate, Discovery Institute, George Gilder, Harvard University, intelligent design, materialism, Michael Medved, Politicians, scientists, Seattle, Steve Buri}

Congratulations to Bruce Chapman, “Godfather” of Intelligent Design

_{David Klinghoffer
June 15, 2018

Intelligent Design

3}

In his new book he discusses some of the overlooked virtues of politicians, and asks, in one chapter, “What Makes a Politician Good?” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
March 26, 2018

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Cambridge University, controversy, debate, ID the Future, intelligent design, Israel, J. Scott Turner, Live Science, National Academy of Sciences, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), National Public Radio, Neo-Darwinism, Oxford University Press, Purpose and Desire: What Makes Something "Alive" and Why Modern Darwinism Has Failed to Explain It, Quarterly Review of Biology, Stephen Meyer, Steven Newton, termite mounds}

What Evolution “Controversy”? Scott Turner Gets High Praise from Quarterly Review of Biology

_{David Klinghoffer
March 26, 2018

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

If you want to know what scientists themselves think about the current status of evolutionary theory, you have to look behind the curtain. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
October 14, 2017

Categories
Bioethics
Biology
Life Sciences
Medicine
Tagged
, __edited, assisted suicide, controversy, death, Department of Health and Human Services, embryology, fertilization, health, life, medicine, public health, science}

Controversial! HHS to Define Life in Line with Embryology Textbooks

_{Wesley J. Smith
October 14, 2017

Bioethics, Biology, Life Sciences, Medicine

2}

The Department of Health and Human Services has published a draft strategic plan for 2018-2022. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 5, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __tedited, censorship, controversy, dissent, Laurence Moran, Neo-Darwinism, New Trends in Evolutionary Biology, paradigm shift, polls, public opinion, Royal Society, science journalism, viewpoint discrimination}

Scientists Versus the Public on Airing Scientific Dissent

_{David Klinghoffer
July 5, 2016

Evolution, Scientific Freedom

5}

A biologist suggests that the upcoming Royal Society meeting might well be canceled rather than open a "can of worms." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 6, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Evolutionary Psychology
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __tedited, behavior, competition, controversy, discrimination, evolutionary psychology, female sports, feminism, hunter-gatherers, imagination, instinct, just-so stories, masculinity, motivation, policymakers, Politics, population dynamics, pre-human ancestors, public opinion, Science Daily, science writers, speculation, Sports, surprise}

As an Exercise, Write a Research Article in Evolutionary Psychology, Off the Top of Your Head

_{David Klinghoffer
May 6, 2016

Evolution, Evolutionary Psychology, Science Reporting

4}

Right now. You can do it. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 15, 2016

Categories
Bioethics
Environment & Climate
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __tedited, academic institutions, attorneys, Bill Nye, climate change, controversy, criminals, delusions, environmental movement, justice, madness, paradigm shift, Politics, skeptics}

Now It’s Bill Nye the “Jailing Science Skeptics as War Criminals” Guy

_{David Klinghoffer
April 15, 2016

Bioethics, Environment & Climate, Scientific Freedom

3}

Absurd habits of thinking can collapse on themselves, suddenly, like the Dutch tulip mania of the 17th century. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 15, 2016

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __tedited, Christian colleges, circular reasoning, controversy, cryptography, design detection, Dover trial, empirical evidence, forensic science, hype, inference, information theory, mind, professors, science media, science reporting, scientific advance}

Is the Market for Articles that Ask “Is Intelligent Design Dead?” Dead?

_{David Klinghoffer
April 15, 2016

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Science Reporting

5}

Evidently not, because atheists and theistic evolutionists keep pumping them out, as they've done for ten years now since the Dover decision. Read More ›