Tag: common science

^{Type
post

Author
Granville Sewell

Date
June 2, 2025

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, children, College Physics, common science, computer simulation, computers, David Klinghoffer, evolution, fundamental forces, humans, intelligent design, James Tour, materialistic science, Mathematical Intelligencer, mathematicians, Michael Kent, natural phenomena, Peter Urone, physics, Plato's Revenge, quantum mechanics, Rice University, Richard Sternberg, scientific evidence, smart phones, spaceships, supernatural, unintelligent}

Evolution and Common-Sense Reasoning

_{Granville Sewell
June 2, 2025

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Scientific Reasoning

5}

The equations of quantum mechanics do not describe exactly — even in theory — the effects of the fundamental forces on the fundamental particles of physics. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
March 20, 2025

Categories
Science Reporting
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, academic disciplines, academic institutions, amateur science, Andrew McDiarmid, Anthony Watts, censorship, Charles Darwin, Christianity, climate change, common science, credentialism, culture, defining science, elitism, empirical science, experimental science, Forrest Mims, interviews, Maverick Scientist, PhD, prejudice, scientists, skeptics, Watts Up with That}

“What Is a Scientist?” A Fine Review for Forrest Mims

_{David Klinghoffer
March 20, 2025

Science Reporting, Scientific Freedom

3}

"A critique of scientific elitism, and a guidebook for anyone who wants to pursue real science — regardless of credentials." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Elizabeth Whately

Date
April 16, 2021

Categories
Arts
Astronomy
Mathematics
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, common science, cosmic beginning, Edgar Allan Poe, elitism, ether, light, philosophers, poetry, Return of the God Hypothesis, Science, scientific method, scientists, stars, Stephen Meyer, universe}

Edgar Allan Poe — Scientist

_{Elizabeth Whately
April 16, 2021

Arts, Astronomy, Mathematics, Physical Sciences

3}

In order to think scientifically, you must have an advanced degree in science. Right? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 5, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __nedited, common science, Darwin's House of Cards, Science Literacy, Tom Bethell}

Journalist Tom Bethell Puts to Rest the “I’m Not a Scientist” Dodge

_{David Klinghoffer
February 5, 2017

Evolution, Science Reporting

1}

My wife was complaining to me today that I don't podcast enough. Hah! Here's a new episode of ID the Future. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 31, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Science Reporting
Scientific Trustworthiness
Tagged
, __nedited, anchovies, book reviews, Charles Darwin, common ancestry, common science, Darwin's House of Cards, Darwinism, Discovery Institute Press, dissent, evolutionary narrative, fossil record, novelty, On the Origin of Species, progress, reversion to the average, skepticism, stasis, testability, Tom Bethell}

Tom Bethell’s Rebuke to Fellow Journalists: A Skeptical Look at Evolution Is Not Beyond Your Powers

_{David Klinghoffer
January 31, 2017

Evolution, Science Reporting, Scientific Trustworthiness

7}

Darwin's edifice rests on a 19th century faith in Progress, propped up by a dogmatic commitment to materialism. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 31, 2016

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, biologic institute, book reviews, common science, design intuition, Doug Axe, elitism, experts, functional coherence, hierarchical organization, Jeremy England, probabilities, Undeniable (book)}

#2 of Our Top Stories of 2016: Douglas Axe Liberates Readers from Tyranny of Evolution “Experts”

_{David Klinghoffer
December 31, 2016

Intelligent Design

7}

It was with a familiar longing that I turned the last page of Dr. Axe's new book. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
December 7, 2016

Categories
Philosophy
Science Education
Scientific Freedom
Scientific Trustworthiness
Tagged
, __edited, common science, Critique, p-hacking, science, scientific inquiry, scientific reliability, scientism, Undeniable (book)}

Naval Academy Philosopher: Laypeople Are Entitled to an Opinion on Science Questions

_{Sarah Chaffee
December 7, 2016

Philosophy, Science Education, Scientific Freedom, Scientific Trustworthiness

5}

The "participatory model" is a worthy complement to Doug Axe's "common science." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 12, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __tedited, accessibility, common science, expertise, functional coherence, intellectual exploration, laymen, nature, random mutations, random processes, Undeniable (book), Universal Design Intuition}

In Undeniable, Douglas Axe Liberates Readers from the Tyranny of Evolution “Experts”

_{David Klinghoffer
July 12, 2016

Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

6}

It was with a familiar longing that I turned the last page of Dr. Axe's new book. Read More ›