Rear-view_mirror Type post Author David Coppedge Date October 20, 2022 CategoriesBiologyEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , Caltech, Christie Wilcox, chromosomes, Duke University, ENCODE, evolution, GENCODE, genes, intelligent design, John Mattick, junk DNA, miRNA, mRNAs, Nature Methods, ncRNAs, noncoding RNAs, Research, RNA, The Scientist, UC San Diego, University of New South Wales Noncoding RNA Research Gaining Ground Over “Junk” Label David Coppedge October 20, 2022 Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design 9 Perhaps it won’t be long before everyone, critics included, looks at the “junk DNA” concept in the rear-view mirror. Read More ›
DNA Type post Date April 21, 2022 CategoriesBiologyEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , biologists, Christie Wilcox, Dan Graur, evolution, evolutionary processes, foresight, functionality, intelligent design, junk DNA, Paul Nelson, science stopper, syllogism, The Scientist, Twitter, University of Houston Dan Graur: The Core Rationale for Claiming “Junk DNA” Science and Culture April 21, 2022 Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design 2 This explains why many researchers, who are fully on board with evolution, nonetheless ignore Graur’s advice. Read More ›
Cinderella Type post Date February 17, 2022 CategoriesBiochemistryEvolutionGeneticsIntelligent Design Tagged , Christie Wilcox, Cinderella, disease, Drosophila, ENCODE, evolution, Evolution News, intelligent design, junk DNA, Michael Denton, myelin, natural selection, parasites, Paul Nelson, retrotransposons, retroviruses, symbionts, The Scientist, transposable elements, transposons Cinderella Story? Transposons Gain New Respect Science and Culture February 17, 2022 Biochemistry, Evolution, Genetics, Intelligent Design 8 Junk DNA has been getting redress for decades of ignominy. Now, retrotransposons and transposable elements may be next in line for a better reputation. Read More ›
