Recently published literature has overwhelmingly confirmed Jonathan Wells' thesis in The Myth of Junk DNA, refuting the ID critics who still cling to the neo-Darwinian story.
Read More ›
The origin and subsequent maintenance of sex and recombination isn't easily explained by Darwinian evolution. Why is sex a success, despite all its disadvantages?
Read More ›
Paul Nelson and Jonathan Wells, both members of the Society for Developmental Biology, will be presenting posters designed (pun intended) to provoke discussion.
Read More ›
Typically, when someone resorts to bullying, that's an indicator they cannot defend themselves through arguments and must instead use other tactics.
Read More ›
It's through the general captivation of a wide ranging intelligentsia that Darwinism has become dressed in a kind of suit of cultural armor.
Read More ›
With only 60 mutations per generation, even given that some families may mutate more and others less, it does not seem feasible that mutations coupled with natural selection has enough time to create the divergence that we see today.
Read More ›
If PZ is correct that evolutionary biology predicts both similarities and differences among embryos, then evolutionary biology makes no predictions and is unfalsifiable regarding the similarities and differences in vertebrate development. Read More ›
