Category: Computational Sciences | Page 9 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Erik J. Larson

Date
June 4, 2014

Categories
Computational Sciences
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Continuing Series, Mind and Technology, science}

Why Can’t We Explain the Brain?

_{Erik J. Larson
June 4, 2014

Computational Sciences, Intelligent Design

1}

We may simply be on the wrong path. That's not a limitation. It's knowledge. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
June 2, 2014

Categories
Computational Sciences
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Research, science}

Intelligent Design in Action: Informatics

_{Science and Culture
June 2, 2014

Computational Sciences, Intelligent Design

1}

As examples of sciences that depend on intelligent design principles, we've examined archaeology, cryptology and forensics. Here's another. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Erik J. Larson

Date
May 7, 2014

Categories
Computational Sciences
Science
Tagged
, __edited, science, Views}

In an Apocalyptic Mood, Stephen Hawking Overestimates the Evolutionary Future of Smart Machines

_{Erik J. Larson
May 7, 2014

Computational Sciences, Science

7}

The human mind isn't a computer program, though there's never a dearth of people happy to promulgate that view. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Erik J. Larson

Date
May 6, 2014

Categories
Computational Sciences
Mathematics
Science
Tagged
, __edited, science, Views}

What Is a Mind? More Hype from Big Data

_{Erik J. Larson
May 6, 2014

Computational Sciences, Mathematics, Science

9}

Artificial Intelligence -- specifically, "Strong Artificial Intelligence" (Strong AI) -- is a thesis about the capabilities of machines, and equally a commentary on the nature of mind. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 18, 2014

Categories
Computational Sciences
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, BIO-Complexity, peer review, science}

Latest BIO-Complexity Paper Finds that on Irreducible Complexity, Michael Behe Has Not Been Refuted

_{Casey Luskin
April 18, 2014

Computational Sciences, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

"Behe's concept of irreducible complexity has not been falsified by computer models." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 4, 2013

Categories
Computational Sciences
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Mathematics
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __k-review}

Someone at the New York Times Wasn’t Being Sufficiently Vigilant About Stealth "Creationism" When This One Got Through

_{David Klinghoffer
October 4, 2013

Computational Sciences, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Mathematics, Science Reporting

1}

That there are serious shortcomings to orthodox Darwinian theory is not a fact you'd expect to see candidly acknowledged in the Times, or even hinted at. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
September 30, 2013

Categories
Computational Sciences
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, science}

Intelligent Design in Action: Cryptology

_{Science and Culture
September 30, 2013

Computational Sciences, Intelligent Design

1}

Critics of intelligent design keep saying it isn't science. Explain that to many scientists who routinely use ID principles in their work. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
May 7, 2013

Categories
Computational Sciences
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Nature}

The Fairyland of Evolutionary Modeling

_{Science and Culture
May 7, 2013

Computational Sciences, Evolution

1}

What evolutionists can't observe, they can imagine. What the evidence cannot bear, models can provide: a world where evolutionary dreams come true. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
April 18, 2013

Categories
Computational Sciences
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review}

More on "Complexity by Subtraction": You Think They’re Kidding? They’re Not.

_{Science and Culture
April 18, 2013

Computational Sciences, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

As David Klinghoffer noted earlier, a new alternative Darwinian hypothesis has surfaced to answer the argument for intelligent design from irreducible complexity. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
April 10, 2013

Categories
Computational Sciences
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review}

British Atheist Philosopher A.C. Grayling Is Confused About Intelligent Design

_{Jonathan McLatchie
April 10, 2013

Computational Sciences, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

1}

Why is a life-permitting universe "specified" but the birth of A.C. Grayling not so? Read More ›