Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Dickinsonia
Photo: Dickinsonia, by Smith609 at English Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0 <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>, via Wikimedia Commons.
Latest

Günter Bechly on Why Seventy Years of Textbook Wisdom Was Wrong

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Paleontology
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

A new study challenges decades of conventional wisdom on what caused the geologically sudden rise of multicellular life on Earth. So what mechanism triggered the Avalon explosion and other similar infusions of new life? And is it a science stopper to use intelligence as a working hypothesis? On a new episode of ID the Future, we welcome back paleoentemologist Dr. Günter Bechly to answer these questions and more. 

A 1959 paper argued that an increase in oxygen content was a pre-condition for the rise of the first complex macro-organisms. This became mainstream consensus for decades. But a new study shows that this geologic event, known as the Avalon explosion, was actually precipitated by a drop in oxygen levels. Dr. Bechly explains the new paper’s findings. He also relates a recent interaction with a paleontologist colleague who claims to have an explanation for another famous explosion of new biological life, the Cambrian explosion. But on closer inspection, and like other materialist explanations for these great events, it is not sufficient to explain the evidence.

So what mechanism can explain this common pattern of evidence in the fossil record? “The best explanations for these bursts of biological novelty are activities of an intelligent agent,” says Bechly. “Because we know from our experience of the universe that it’s only the activity of intelligent agents that can produce new specified information, because agents are goal-directed and have a plan in view, which they then enact.” 

Is it a science stopper to propose mind as the source of these great infusions of biological information? Quite the opposite, says Bechly. Naturalism is the science stopper, he notes, because it excludes certain possible causes a priori without looking at the data. “But let the data speak! Let the data decide, not worldview.” Download the podcast or listen to it here.

Dig Deeper

Andrew McDiarmid

Director of Podcasting and Senior Fellow
Andrew McDiarmid is Director of Podcasting and a Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute. He is also a contributing writer to Mind Matters. He produces ID The Future, a podcast from the Center for Science & Culture that presents the case, research, and implications of intelligent design and explores the debate over evolution. He writes and speaks regularly on the impact of technology on human living. His work has appeared in numerous publications, including the New York Post, Houston Chronicle, The Daily Wire, San Francisco Chronicle, Real Clear Politics, Newsmax, The American Spectator, The Federalist, Technoskeptic Magazine, and elsewhere. In addition to his roles at Discovery Institute, he promotes his homeland as host of the Scottish culture and music podcast Simply Scottish. Andrew holds an MA in Teaching from Seattle Pacific University and a BA in English/Creative Writing from the University of Washington.
Benefiting from Science & Culture Today?
Support the Center for Science and Culture and ensure that we can continue to publish counter-cultural commentary and original reporting and analysis on scientific research, evolution, neuroscience, bioethics, and intelligent design.

© Discovery Institute