Type post Author Kelley J. Unger Date April 1, 2015 CategoriesBioethicsEvolutionFaith & ScienceIntelligent DesignScience Education Tagged , __k-review, events The Deadline for Summer Seminar Applications Is Less than a Week Away — Please Help Support Our Students! Kelley J. Unger April 1, 2015 Bioethics, Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Science Education 1 "You can cut all the flowers, but you cannot keep spring from coming." Read More ›
Type post Author Erik J. Larson Date April 1, 2015 CategoriesNeuroscience & MindPhilosophyScienceTechnology Tagged , __edited, Continuing Series, Mind and Technology, science, Views Reading David Chalmers on the Coming "Singularity" Erik J. Larson April 1, 2015 Neuroscience & Mind, Philosophy, Science, Technology 10 The New York University philosopher is well known for critiquing the scientific materialist's vision of explaining, someday, the phenomenon of conscious experience in purely material terms. Read More ›
Type post Author Howard Glicksman Date April 1, 2015 CategoriesIntelligent DesignMedicine Tagged , __k-review, Continuing Series, Health & Wellness, science, The Designed Body (series) Death: The Final Frontier Howard Glicksman April 1, 2015 Intelligent Design, Medicine 1 Up until about fifty years ago, the final common pathway to death, no matter the cause, was cardiopulmonary arrest. Read More ›
Type post Author Michael Egnor Date March 31, 2015 CategoriesEvolutionFaith & ScienceIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, events, science, Views A Mind/Brain Lecture and Darwin’s Embarrassment Michael Egnor March 31, 2015 Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design 1 I attended a great lecture a few days ago at my university by Princeton biophysicist William Bialek. Read More ›
Type post Author Casey Luskin Date March 31, 2015 CategoriesEvolution Tagged , __k-review, Incivility, Research, science, Views While Ranting about "Quote Mining" in "Creationists Texts," Paper in Scientific Journal Misquotes and Misrepresents Pro-ID Article Casey Luskin March 31, 2015 Evolution 10 A few weeks ago, my colleague Dr. Logan Gage sent me an email highlighting a new peer-reviewed paper in the highly regarded PLOS ONE. Read More ›
Type post Author Casey Luskin Date March 31, 2015 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, Research, science, Systems Biology "Physiology Is Rocking the Foundations of Evolutionary Biology": Another Peer-Reviewed Paper Takes Aim at Neo-Darwinism Casey Luskin March 31, 2015 Evolution, Intelligent Design 4 Regarding the neo-Darwinian viewpoint, Denis Noble doesn't mince words. Read More ›
Type post Author Bruce Chapman Date March 31, 2015 CategoriesEvolutionFaith & Science Tagged , __k-review, history, science, Views How Goethe Set the Scene for Scientism, and Worse Bruce Chapman March 31, 2015 Evolution, Faith & Science 1 You might think that the culture that allowed Nazism had been fully examined already. Read More ›
Type post Author Michael Flannery Date March 30, 2015 CategoriesEvolutionFaith & ScienceIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, science, Views Oxford University Physicist Ard Louis on Evolution as Self-Constructing LEGO Train Michael Flannery March 30, 2015 Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design 1 Louis, obviously a bright young man, really does think this is sound reasoning. Read More ›
Type post Author Casey Luskin Date March 30, 2015 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, junk DNA, nature, science Hey, "These Sequences May Not Be Junk, After All"! Nature and Heredity Report Function for Non-Coding DNA Casey Luskin March 30, 2015 Evolution, Intelligent Design 6 When we look for function, we find it, and when we don't look for function, someone else finds it. Read More ›
Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date March 30, 2015 CategoriesFaith & ScienceIntelligent DesignPhysical Sciences Tagged , __k-review, Nature, science, Views Why Is the Universe Overwhelmingly "Inhospitable to Life"? David Klinghoffer March 30, 2015 Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Physical Sciences 1 A reader asks for a response to the following challenge to the theory of intelligent design. Read More ›
