That's the CSC which had to shell out $110,000 to settle a viewpoint-discrimination lawsuit over the Center's canceling a screening of Darwin's Dilemma.
Read More ›
To link your name with a guy like James Fetzer in a public fashion, as NCSE's Glenn Branch did, practically invites us to a closer inspection of Fetzer's credentials.
Read More ›
"Facts alone are insufficient to destroy a conspiracy theory, of course, and in many ways a theory's appeal has more to do with the receptiveness of its audience than the accuracy of its details."
Read More ›
The AP story claims that the California Science Center is claiming that Discovery Institute issued "false and misleading press releases" in "an effort to drum up controversy."
Read More ›
Governor Perry of Texas wrongly thinks public schools in his home state teach creationism, but he seems unaware that his own education commissioner is trying to stifle scientific criticisms of Darwin.
Read More ›
After a Darwin activist blogger successfully got Granville Sewell's article pulled from publication, it seems that the first rule of the Darwin lobby is to stifle scientific debate over evolution.
Read More ›
After censoring a peer-reviewed article critical of Neo-Darwinism, the journal Applied Mathematics Letters has had to apologize and pay $10,000.
Read More ›
