Joe_Rogan Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date February 10, 2025 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , Bret Weinstein, Darwinism, designer, epigenetic information, evolution, evolutionary biologists, evolutionists, Günter Bechly, immaterial genome, intelligent design, Joe Rogan, morphological change, natural selection, parsimony, Platonists, random mutation, Richard Sternberg, Stephen Meyer, tiger, USAID Bret Weinstein on the Joe Rogan Podcast: Darwinism Is “Broken,” Intelligent Design Is “Catching Up” David Klinghoffer February 10, 2025 Evolution, Intelligent Design 6 Dr. Weinstein alludes to another Darwinian mechanism operating on top of the standard one of random mutation and natural selection. Read More ›
Atlantic horseshoe crab) 3 Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date May 15, 2018 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, arthropods, Darwinian theory, discontinuity, evolution, falsification, fossil record, gradualism, Günter Bechly, ID the Future, information, intelligent design, magic wand, morphological change, podcast, Sarah Chaffee, The Guardian, trilobites Bechly: Why the Phenomenon of Living Fossils Is Under “Massive Attack” David Klinghoffer May 15, 2018 Evolution, Intelligent Design 2 If you ever encounter a horseshoe crab on the beach, you are a looking at a creature that would not have appeared out of place hundreds of millions of years ago. Read More ›
Type post Date April 27, 2016 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent DesignPaleontology Tagged , __tedited, Casey Luskin, dentists, Don McLeroy, experts, fossil record, Jerry Coyne, kinds, land mammals, macroevolution, mammals, microevolution, morphological change, pentadactyl design, placental mammals, Richard Sternberg, terrestrial animals, waiting-time problem, whale evolution On Whale Origins, Evolutionary Biologist Goes After Dentist While Hiding Behind Family Doctor Science and Culture April 27, 2016 Evolution, Intelligent Design, Paleontology 4 Why not grapple with a fellow evolutionary biologist, like Richard Sternberg? Read More ›
