There seems to be an idea on the part of some critics that my analysis in Science and Human Origins means that humans arose four million years ago.
Read More ›
Critics of intelligent design often claim that the peer-reviewed literature published by ID proponents amounts to nothing more than a negative critique of neo-Darwinism.
Read More ›
Jefferson argued for his belief in a pervasive "design" behind nature, "without appeal to revelation" -- that is, from a scientific not a religious perspective.
Read More ›
This creature has stumbled upon its unique technology any number of times in its history, then lost it, and then stumbled on it again, in independent gecko lineages.
Read More ›
"How can one mechanism [Darwinism] have been at the same time so effective and so ineffective? That tension vanishes completely when the design perspective is adopted."
Read More ›