Behe begins by observing that at the molecular level, far more mutations will cause loss-of function (LOF) than will cause a gain-of-function (GOF).
Read More ›
The critics of intelligent design don't want people to read Darwin's Doubt. Here's a new video you can use to counter their campaign to suppress interest in the book.
Read More ›
Sewell's recent articles address a rejoinder from Darwin-defenders and reframe the issue to show that the second law could potentially be a problem for Darwinian evolution.
Read More ›
It is difficult to see how the results of this experiment are really much different than, say, the variation in finch beak sizes on the Galapagos Islands or the coloration of the Peppered Moth on the trees in England.
Read More ›
An ID-based paradigm of biology can help us understand the functions of pseudogenes, whereas a neo-Darwinian paradigm leads us to wrongly assume these genes like the GULO "pseudogene" are "broken" genetic "junk."
Read More ›
One noteworthy paper in that section is by William Dembski, Winston Ewert, and Robert Marks, "A General Theory of Information Cost Incurred by Successful Search."
Read More ›
We thought it was important to repost this excellent response by Casey Luskin, which serves as a decisive rebuttal to Dr. Prothero's claims.
Read More ›
