Science and Culture Today | Discovering Design in Nature

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 2, 2013

Categories
Intelligent Design
Science Education
Tagged
, __k-review, News}

On Discovery Institute and Intelligent Design, New York Times Egregiously Distorts the Record

_{David Klinghoffer
September 2, 2013

Intelligent Design, Science Education

1}

This is shoddy reporting, and it explains why we are indeed on the alert for Darwinists "misrepresenting [our] work." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
September 2, 2013

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Cambrian News, Colleagues' Responses, Research}

Complexity by Subtraction Was Weird Enough; Now, Complexity by Harmful Mutations

_{Science and Culture
September 2, 2013

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

A new paper casts evolution as kind of a trampoline: organisms can bounce higher by jumping off the fitness peak. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Donald McLaughlin

Date
August 31, 2013

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Research}

Science with a Sneer: A New Model for Scientific Papers?

_{Donald McLaughlin
August 31, 2013

Evolution

1}

A recent paper published in PLOS ONE purports to have established Darwinian evolution and common ancestry beyond all questioning. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
August 30, 2013

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Politics}

Won’t Someone Please Teach Hank Campbell How to Read?

_{David Klinghoffer
August 30, 2013

Evolution

1}

Mr. Campbell of Science 2.0 has been nursing a grudge against Wesley Smith -- why, I do not know. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
August 30, 2013

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, science}

Natural Selection Is Empty

_{Michael Egnor
August 30, 2013

Evolution

9}

Jerry Fodor and Massimo Piatelli-Palmarini's book�What Darwin Got Wrong�was published in 2010. Having read it now, perhaps belatedly, I can report that it is a masterpiece. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
August 30, 2013

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, science, Views}

When It Comes to Science, Hank Campbell Says, “Down with Definitions!”

_{David Klinghoffer
August 30, 2013

Evolution

1}

The gist of Campell's new article is that it's a diagnostic sign that you are seeking to "undermine science" if you insist, in scientific controversies, that definitions matter. What a funny idea! Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
August 29, 2013

Categories
Bioethics
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Views}

I Have to Answer Jerry Coyne’s Silly Blog Post on Determinism. I Have No Choice.

_{Michael Egnor
August 29, 2013

Bioethics, Evolution

1}

If Jerry has no free will, he didn't choose to write his blog post. His blog post was determined by natural history and physical laws, not by intelligence. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
August 28, 2013

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, BIO-Complexity, peer review, Research}

The Fabric of Nature: Michael Denton’s New BIO-Complexity Paper Argues for “Laws of Form” Finely Tuned for Life

_{Casey Luskin
August 28, 2013

Evolution, Intelligent Design

7}

Just as Darwinism cannot explain these laws, the laws themselves cannot explain all the adaptive complexity of life. Structuralism leaves plenty of room for intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Bruce Chapman

Date
August 28, 2013

Categories
Science
Tagged
, __k-review, science, Views}

Unsettling Science

_{Bruce Chapman
August 28, 2013

Science

1}

Real Clear Science is a disappointing source of scientific news and opinion, largely because it seems to be edited with the idea that there is no mere "opinion" to it. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
August 28, 2013

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, junk DNA}

Unitary Pseudogenes and RNA Editing

_{Jonathan McLatchie
August 28, 2013

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Broken genes that appear to have been disabled by mutations have long been the flagship of many a critique of intelligent design. Read More ›