Author: William A. Dembski | Page 12 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
December 6, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review}

Rational Justification as Detailed Articulation: A Reply to Barham and Nagel

_{William A. Dembski
December 6, 2012

Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

10}

Nagel offers no concrete proposal of what a teleological process capable of originating biological complexity might look like. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
November 5, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Mind and Cosmos, Views}

Defecting from Darwinian Naturalism: A Review of Thomas Nagel’s Mind & Cosmos

_{William A. Dembski
November 5, 2012

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

About a decade ago I would muse on what it might take for intelligent design to win the day. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
October 1, 2012

Categories
Biology
Cosmology
Intelligent Design
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, __nedited, constraints, design detection, design hypothesis, Design Inference, designer, God, hypothesis, ID research program, intelligence, open-mindedness, optimality, specified complexity, transmission, variability}

Design Inference vs. Design Hypothesis

_{William A. Dembski
October 1, 2012

Biology, Cosmology, Intelligent Design, Scientific Reasoning

24}

On a bright December day in 1994 in Green Valley, Arizona, the term "design inference" hit me. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
August 28, 2012

Categories
Computational Sciences
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review}

Conservation of Information Made Simple

_{William A. Dembski
August 28, 2012

Computational Sciences, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Conservation of information is not a difficult concept and once it is understood, it becomes clear that evolutionary processes cannot create the information required to power biological evolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
June 28, 2012

Categories
Computational Sciences
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review}

Dennett on Competence without Comprehension

_{William A. Dembski
June 28, 2012

Computational Sciences, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

In Turing's contribution to computer science, Daniel Dennett finds proof that a reductionist, materialist understanding of life and cognition is well in hand. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
June 27, 2012

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, events}

Science and Religion at the Portsmouth Institute

_{William A. Dembski
June 27, 2012

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

11}

Some lessons drawn from debating Darwinists in general, and Ken Miller in particular. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
May 9, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review}

Is Darwinism Theologically Neutral? A Reply to Darrel Falk

_{William A. Dembski
May 9, 2012

Evolution, Faith & Science

1}

Readers who expect a sharp clash of swords will be disappointed. In fact, some might wonder what disagreement, if any, exists between us. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
January 25, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Alfred Russel Wallace, Darwin, Darwinian evolution, evolution, intelligent design, James Shapiro}

Is James Shapiro a Darwinist After All?

_{William A. Dembski
January 25, 2012

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Has Shapiro really solved anything? His "third way" seems more like an equivocation strategy. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
January 12, 2012

Categories
Cosmology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Genesis, Illustra Media, Robert Jastrow, Stephen Hawking, The Privileged Planet}

Is James Shapiro a Design Theorist?

_{William A. Dembski
January 12, 2012

Cosmology, Intelligent Design

1}

Shapiro is as dismissive of Darwinism as any ID proponent. On the other, he constantly gives public notice that he is not on the side of ID. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Witt

Date
April 2, 2005

Categories
Science Education
Tagged
, __edited}

Syndicated Article Presents Opinion as Fact

_{Jonathan Witt and William A. Dembski
April 2, 2005

Science Education

1}

In a recent news story, Alexandra Witze writes, “Although intelligent design is not scientific …” That’s highly misleading. In a supposedly fair and accurate news story about this growing controversy, Witze presents as fact a key point of contention in the debate.