Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date October 9, 2013 CategoriesEvolutionFaith & ScienceIntelligent DesignScience Education Tagged , __k-review Letter From a Darwinist High School Biology Teacher David Klinghoffer October 9, 2013 Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Science Education 1 Over the weekend a number of us at Discovery Institute received a nasty, taunting email. Read More ›
Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date October 8, 2013 CategoriesIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, Research, video Video: Flight of the Fruit Fly David Klinghoffer October 8, 2013 Intelligent Design 1 As University of Washington neuroethologist Michael Dickinson urges, "Think before you swat." Read More ›
Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date October 7, 2013 CategoriesBioethicsEvolution Tagged , __k-review, video Catching Up with Darwin: See the New Trailer for The War on Humans, with Wesley J. Smith David Klinghoffer October 7, 2013 Bioethics, Evolution 1 It's not simply a matter of humanizing animals -- but of animalizing people. And hating them, with a vicious obsessiveness. Read More ›
Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date October 4, 2013 CategoriesEvolutionScientific Freedom Tagged , __k-review, Ball State University University of Iowa Chemist Rebuked by Faculty for Acknowledging "Holes" in Darwinian Theory David Klinghoffer October 4, 2013 Evolution, Scientific Freedom 1 The professor, Ned Bowden, was writing in an official university publication, Iowa Now, and 25 of his fellow faculty members took umbrage. Read More ›
Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date October 4, 2013 CategoriesComputational SciencesEvolutionIntelligent DesignMathematicsScience Reporting Tagged , __k-review Someone at the New York Times Wasn’t Being Sufficiently Vigilant About Stealth "Creationism" When This One Got Through David Klinghoffer October 4, 2013 Computational Sciences, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Mathematics, Science Reporting 1 That there are serious shortcomings to orthodox Darwinian theory is not a fact you'd expect to see candidly acknowledged in the Times, or even hinted at. Read More ›
Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date October 3, 2013 CategoriesEvolution Tagged , __k-review, science, Views “Science Is Not Democratic.” Who Knew? David Klinghoffer October 3, 2013 Evolution 1 Someone needs to alert the National Center for Science Education. Read More ›
Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date October 3, 2013 CategoriesIntelligent DesignPhilosophy Tagged , __k-review, history A 240-Year-Old Automaton: The Idea of Man Under Materialism David Klinghoffer October 3, 2013 Intelligent Design, Philosophy 1 Whoa, this is both impressive and creepy. Read More ›
Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date October 2, 2013 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, Book News & Events, Colleagues' Responses, Darwin's Doubt, Response to Criticism Stephen Meyer Answers Charles Marshall on Darwin’s Doubt David Klinghoffer October 2, 2013 Evolution, Intelligent Design 1 Marshall's review is an implicit rebuke to those critics who came before and thought their methods of evasion were an adequate reply. Read More ›
Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date October 2, 2013 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, academic freedom, Ball State University, Colleagues' Responses, Darwin's Doubt, free speech, intelligent design, Response to Criticism A Taxonomy of Evasion: Reviewing the Reviewers of Darwin’s Doubt David Klinghoffer October 2, 2013 Evolution, Intelligent Design 1 For his review in Science of Stephen Meyer's Darwin's Doubt, UC Berkeley paleontologist Charles Marshall wins a prize. Read More ›
Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date October 2, 2013 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent DesignScience Reporting Tagged , __k-review, Book News & Events, Colleagues' Responses, Darwin's Doubt, Response to Criticism In the Matter of John Farrell’s Silly Review of Darwin’s Doubt, National Review Sets Things Straight David Klinghoffer October 2, 2013 Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science Reporting 1 You know, the one that climaxed with an examination of Stephen Meyer's placement of an ellipsis mark. Read More ›
