Jefferson argued for his belief in a pervasive "design" behind nature, "without appeal to revelation" -- that is, from a scientific not a religious perspective.
Read More ›
"How can one mechanism [Darwinism] have been at the same time so effective and so ineffective? That tension vanishes completely when the design perspective is adopted."
Read More ›
Dr. Carson has found unavoidable scientific evidence of purpose and design throughout his medical studies, and not just in the human brain.
Read More ›
Dembski observes that a materialist-evolutionist like Daniel Dennett needs intelligence to be reducible to a dumb uncomprehending mechanism.
Read More ›
This sounds very much like computer programming, where options are programmed into the code, but the code is not itself making the decisions.
Read More ›
Wikipedia's articles on anything to do with intelligent design are replete with errors and lies, which the online encyclopedia's volunteer editors are vigilant about maintaining.
Read More ›
Some critics of Science and Human Origins charge that the authors have no business writing about the subject because they aren't paleoanthropologists.
Read More ›
Last year Harry Lonsdale launched the "Origin of Life Challenge" and called on scientists to propose explanations for how life came from non-life, promising rich rewards.
Read More ›
