Meyer book background image Type post Author Michael Egnor Date December 5, 2022 CategoriesFaith & ScienceIntelligent DesignMetaphysicsPhysical Sciences Tagged , Anselm, atheism, Augustinian Proof, Big Bang, Edward Feser, general relativity, ground of existence, ignorance, insanity, intelligent design, Necessary Existence, Ontological Argument, philosophers, Return of the God Hypothesis, Roman Catholic, Stephen Meyer, Thomas Aquinas God Hypothesis: In Defense of Stephen Meyer’s Book Title Michael Egnor December 5, 2022 Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Metaphysics, Physical Sciences 5 What Dr. Meyer did was enter the atheist camp, take up their flawed tools, and defeat them with their own weapons. Read More ›
moonlight-1 Type post Author Michael Egnor Date October 15, 2019 CategoriesAstronomyFaith & ScienceMetaphysicsPhilosophy Tagged , __edited, a posteriori argument, a priori, act, Big Bang, Big Crunch, causation, change, cosmological arguments, existence, First Way, Five Ways, law of non-contradiction, logic, lunar phases, Moon, moonlight, Necessary Existence, potency, reflection, sun, Third Way, Thomas Aquinas Aquinas’ Third Way: An Analogy to Moonlight Michael Egnor October 15, 2019 Astronomy, Faith & Science, Metaphysics, Philosophy 6 Imagine that you are an astronomer on a world with one moon. It is always night on your world, and the moon is the only body in the sky. Read More ›
Moon-from-ISS Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date September 27, 2019 CategoriesFaith & ScienceIntelligent DesignPhilosophy Tagged , __edited, atheism, Christianity, cosmological argument, Darwinists, evolution, Granville Sewell, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, law of non-contradiction, materialists, Michael Egnor, Necessary Existence, potentiality, Richard Dawkins, Sir David Attenborough, Thomas Aquinas, Uncaused Cause, Unmoved Mover “Who Designed the Designer?”: Egnor Addresses a Perennial Challenge David Klinghoffer September 27, 2019 Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Philosophy 4 Because the challenge is perennial, and because we’re not all philosophers, it’s good to come back to it from time to time. Read More ›
