Tag: Debating Darwin’s Doubt

^{Type
post

Author
David Coppedge

Date
July 13, 2022

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, bilaterians, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, Casey Luskin, Charles Darwin, Charles Marshall, citrate, Current Biology, David Klinghoffer, Debating Darwin's Doubt, Ediacaran Period, evolution, gene regulatory networks, Graham Budd, intelligent design, James Valentine, Maximilian Telford, phenotypes, Precambrian, Richard Lenski, Stephen Meyer, The Information Enigma, Uppsala University, Vernanimalcula}

On Cambrian Explosion, Biology Journal’s Special Issue Betrays Cause for Darwin Doubts

_{David Coppedge
July 13, 2022

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

14}

The strength of a theory can be gauged by how well it stands up to attacks and how well it incorporates new evidence. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
September 8, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, BIO-Complexity, computer programmers, computer scientists, creationism, Debating Darwin's Doubt, dependency graph, evolution, FORA.tv, genetic data, intelligent design, Neo-Darwinism, phylogenetic analysis, Richard Dawkins, Stephen Meyer, Winston Ewert}

Does Tree-Like Data Refute Intelligent Design?

_{Casey Luskin
September 8, 2021

Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

Computer scientist Winston Ewert applied the concept of “common design” to propose a “dependency graph” model of organismal relationships. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 22, 2021

Categories
Biology
Cosmology
Faith & Science
Philosophy
Tagged
, Cambridge, Cambridge University, Debating Darwin's Doubt, England, information, James Croft, mind-body dualism, minds, naturalism, Return of the God Hypothesis, Stephen Meyer}

A Philosopher Takes on Meyer’s God Hypothesis

_{David Klinghoffer
June 22, 2021

Biology, Cosmology, Faith & Science, Philosophy

4}

What was missing until now is a weighing of the philosophical side of Dr. Meyer's argument, on which much depends. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 12, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __edited, Adam Sedgwick, Cambridge University, Center for Science and Culture, Charles Darwin, creationism, Darwin Day, Darwinian theory, debate, Debating Darwin's Doubt, evolution, football, free speech, Harvard University, Herman Bouma, ID the Future, intelligent design, John West, Jonathan Witt, Karl Nageli, Louis Agassiz, Michael Behe, National Science Teaching Association, On the Origin of Species, Sarah Chaffee, St. Louis, zoos}

Who Really Inherited Darwin’s Legacy? You Might Be Surprised to Learn

_{David Klinghoffer
February 12, 2020

Scientific Freedom

5}

Design scientists like Michael Behe have, in an important way, been following in Darwin’s path for decades. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
February 12, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, American Humanist Association, Austria, Brazil, Charles Darwin, Darwin Day, David Gelernter, Debating Darwin's Doubt, Facebook, Foresight (book), intelligent design, Israel, Italy, Marcos Eberlin, Nobel Prize, scholars, scientists, South America, Yale University}

Say Happy Birthday to Charles Darwin

_{John G. West
February 12, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

If you send us a gift for Darwin’s birthday, I will send YOU a free gift. This will drive Darwinists crazy! Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 1, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, Ben Shapiro, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Doubt, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, Debating Darwin's Doubt, Discovery Institute Press, Douglas Axe, evolution, intelligent design, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, National Academy of Sciences, Paul Nelson, Richard Lenski, Stephen Meyer, The Claremont Review of Books, The Deniable Darwin, Thomas Nagel, Tom Wolfe, Yale University}

#1 of Our Top Stories of 2019: Informed by Discovery Authors, Yale’s David Gelernter Rejects Darwinism

_{David Klinghoffer
January 1, 2020

Evolution

5}

He credits reading Meyer’s book as the primary cause of his rejecting neo-Darwinian evolution, a “brilliant and beautiful scientific theory” now overtaken by science. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
November 19, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, Ann Gauger, Central America, Charles Darwin, Darwinists, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, Debating Darwin's Doubt, Discovery Institute, Evolution News, fake news, free speech, Google, Guillermo Gonzalez, Günter Bechly, Jonathan Wells, media, Michael Behe, Spanish, Stephen Meyer, Yale University}

Drive Darwinists Nuts with This One Solution to Fake News

_{John G. West
November 19, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

Free speech doesn’t mean much if there is no platform where dissenting ideas can actually be heard. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 4, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Mathematics
Tagged
, __edited, Brian Miller, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, Dan Tawfik, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Doubt, Darwinism, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, David Klinghoffer, Debating Darwin's Doubt, development, evolution, Gerd Müller, Günter Bechly, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Michael Egnor, mutations, neo-Darwinian theory, New Trends in Evolutionary Biology, paleontology, Peter Robinson, protein folds, proteins, Quillette, Royal Society, Science (journal), Stephen Meyer, The Deniable Darwin, Weizmann Institute}

Coyne, Bechly, Miller, Berlinski: Scientists Debate David Gelernter’s Darwin Apostasy

_{David Klinghoffer
October 4, 2019

Biology, Evolution, Mathematics

7}

If anyone is worrying, it is Coyne and his fellow Darwinists, alarmed at the defection of a stellar intellect like Gelernter. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 17, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, alt-right, Charles Darwin, Darwin Devolves, Darwinists, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, Debating Darwin's Doubt, evolution, foresight, Holocaust denial, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Jonathan Wells, Judaism, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, motives, Old Testament, Paul Nelson, Razib Khan}

Two Ways for ID Critics, Both Lame

_{David Klinghoffer
May 17, 2019

Intelligent Design

3}

As others have said before me, one of the first things you notice about ID critics is the low level of most of their critiques. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 10, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Ben Shapiro, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Doubt, David Berlinski, David Gelernter, Debating Darwin's Doubt, Dennis Prager, Douglas Axe, evolution, intelligent design, Judaism, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, National Academy of Sciences, Paul Nelson, Richard Lenski, Stephen Meyer, The Claremont Review of Books, The Deniable Darwin, Thomas Nagel, Tom Wolfe, Yale University}

Yale’s David Gelernter: Darwin’s Doubt Is “One of the Most Important Books in a Generation”

_{David Klinghoffer
May 10, 2019

Evolution

5}

He credits reading Meyer’s book as the primary cause of his rejecting neo-Darwinian evolution, a “brilliant and beautiful scientific theory” now overtaken by science. Read More ›