Denying the Signature: Of Minds and Causes

_{Stephen C. Meyer
November 23, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Philosophy

1}

Bishop and O'Connor claim that in Darwin's Doubt, my "analysis assumes that... mind is fundamentally immaterial." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Stephen C. Meyer

Date
November 21, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin's Doubt, Meyer's Responses, Response to Criticism, science}

Denying the Signature: Methodological Naturalism and Materialism-of-the Gaps

_{Stephen C. Meyer
November 21, 2015

Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

5}

O'Connor and Bishop offer no evolutionary mechanism as an explanation for the origin of the information necessary to produce novel forms of life. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
November 20, 2015

Categories
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Tagged
, __k-review, Colleagues' Responses, Darwin's Doubt, Response to Criticism, science, Views}

Life Is a “Distinguished Outcome”

_{Michael Egnor
November 20, 2015

Intelligent Design, Philosophy

1}

Nothing in biology makes sense without inference to functional biological information. Read More ›

complete pyritised Leonaspis (Kettneraspis) sp. trilobite from Morocco

^{Type
post

Author
Stephen C. Meyer

Date
November 20, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin's Doubt, Meyer's Responses, Response to Criticism, science}

Denying the Signature: Was My Argument Subjective?

_{Stephen C. Meyer
November 20, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design

11}

Bishop and O'Connor claim there is no objective, scientific basis for privileging, or focusing on, "life" in my analysis. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Stephen C. Meyer

Date
November 19, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin's Doubt, Meyer's Responses, Response to Criticism, science}

Denying the Signature: Functional Information Is the Fact to Be Explained

_{Stephen C. Meyer
November 19, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design

8}

Philosophers of science analyzing scientific arguments make a clear distinction between what needs to be explained and the competing explanations. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 18, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __k-review, Book News & Events, Darwin's Doubt, News and Events, science}

The View Takes on Intelligent Design, Sort Of

_{David Klinghoffer
November 18, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science Reporting

1}

Pressed to name a scientist who supports ID, Candace Bure at one point said, "I would love to bring them on the show." No kidding? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Stephen C. Meyer

Date
November 17, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin's Doubt, Meyer's Responses, News and Events, Response to Criticism}

Denying the Signature: A Response to Bishop and O’Connor

_{Stephen C. Meyer
November 17, 2015

Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

10}

Philosophers Robert Bishop and Robert O'Connor offer a cleverly titled joint review of Darwin's Doubt and Signature in the Cell. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
November 14, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Colleagues' Responses, Darwin's Doubt, Response to Criticism, science, Views}

More on the “Mechanism” of Intelligent Design

_{Ann Gauger
November 14, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Biochemist Larry Moran kindly asked how Stephen Meyer thinks design in biology was instantiated. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
November 13, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, __k-review, Colleagues' Responses, Darwin's Doubt, Response to Criticism, science}

What’s the Mechanism of Intelligent Design?

_{Ann Gauger
November 13, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Neuroscience & Mind

1}

University of Toronto biochemist Larry Moran has issued a challenge that advocates of intelligent design have heard before. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
November 11, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Cambrian News, Darwin's Doubt, News and Events, Response to Criticism, science}

Three More Problematic Findings About the Cambrian Explosion

_{Science and Culture
November 11, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

The issues are separate, but they have one thing in common: they create new headaches for Darwinian accounts of the Cambrian explosion. Read More ›