PrincetownAUPortCampbellNationalParkTwelveApostle Type post Author David Klinghoffer Date July 7, 2025 CategoriesIntelligent DesignScientific Reasoning Tagged , argument in the alternative, attorneys, biology, Casey Luskin, Dallas Conference on Science and Faith, Darwinian evolution, defining id, defining science, definist fallacy, demarcation criteria, evidence, evidence for id, evolution, geologists, historical sciences, ID research program, intelligent design, lawyers, natural world, non-science, peer-reviewed literature, predictive-success, Research, science, scientific method, testability The Divide Between Science and Non-Science David Klinghoffer July 7, 2025 Intelligent Design, Scientific Reasoning 2 The most commonly heard charge against ID is that it “isn’t science” and therefore can’t even be evaluated as a scientific alternative to Darwinian evolution. Read More ›
