A theory like Darwin's that purports to explain all of nature and of life itself cannot be separated from the metaphysical commitments of its founder.
Read More ›
The ID field is more than prepared to grant a hearing to scientific agnosticism whereas Darwinian orthodoxy demands immediate capitulation.
Read More ›
Meredith, a pathologist who teaches literature courses at the University of Chicago, largely dispenses with the science, instead subjecting ID to a critique as theology.
Read More ›
Before vision reaches the brain, retinal cells massage it with multi-step image processing operations. That's where some of the "magic happens," say neuroscientists.
Read More ›
I thought I would excerpt here the section (pp. 392-398) from Darwin's Doubt in which Meyer explains Asher's main objection and responds to it.
Read More ›
