Science and Culture Today | Page 1434 | Discovering Design in Nature
Iowa State Daily Misconstrues Astrobiologist’s Position on Debating Intelligent Design
Did the ACLU Lie to the Federal Courts in the Cobb County Evolution Sticker Case?
For Darwinists There is No Presenting Both Sides in Intelligent Design Debate
Rewriting History: Museum Fails to Disclose Own Role in Social Darwinism
Nature Magazines’s Choice Blogger Has Heaps of Fun with the Crucifixion
NYT Story Misinforms on Intelligent Design and Templeton
Nature Magazine Promotes Darwinist who Favors Using Brass Knuckles on ID Proponents
MSNBC does creditable review of students’ anxieties over evolution
This is my second post in 2 days praising media articles which get this issue right. Let there be no mistake: the Evolution News & Views blog is not a “media complaints desk.” It’s a place for objective analysis–and we just try to call the balls and the strikes as we see them! MSNBC’s Current Magazine article by Victoria Bosch (“Monkey Business“), manages to objectively discuss the question of how doubters of Darwin are treated in college science classes. The article sensitively talks about how students who are skeptical of Darwinism cope with the issue. It was also gratifying that Niall Shanks at Wichita State professes to require only that students simply understand–not fully endorse–Darwinian evolution. Not only is it Read More ›
Excellent Pieces in The New Republic and The New Criterion take aim at Scientism
The New Republic and The New Criterion have excellent pieces discussing the debate over Darwin. The former explains how Darwinism has become a brand of scientism in the eyes of many leading proponents. The latter takes aim at the science of Darwinism itself, comparing it to a dogmatic faith which makes claims beyond what is warranted from the evidence. Monkey and Morals In Monkey and Morals, Gertrude Himmelfarb, the distinguished professor emeritus of history at City University (N.Y.), explains that some Darwinists such as E. O. Wilson and James Watson have an anti-religious agenda in their Darwinian advocacy. Himmelfarb recognizes, however, that some proponents of intelligent design approach this issue with scientific objections to evolution: “Yet others, themselves scientists, insist Read More ›