Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature

Science and Culture Today | Page 1434 | Discovering Design in Nature

Iowa State Daily Misconstrues Astrobiologist’s Position on Debating Intelligent Design

The reporter does deserve credit for interviewing Iowa State's Tom Ingebritsen, associate professor of genetics, who says that, while ID shouldn't be taught as fact, it isn't "unreasonable to discuss the subject in a science class" (reporter's language). Read More ›

Did the ACLU Lie to the Federal Courts in the Cobb County Evolution Sticker Case?

*Did the ACLU Lie to the Federal Courts in the Cobb County Evolution Sticker Case?* "The court gives two bases for its findings and they're absolutely wrong," [Judge] Carnes told Atlanta lawyer Jeffrey Bramlett, who argued on behalf of five parents who sued the school board to get the stickers removed. ... At the end of the arguments, Carnes took the highly unusual step of calling Bramlett back up to the podium and suggested he may have mislead the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in his legal brief filed with the court. Read rest at Evolution News & Views, www.scienceandculture.com. Read More ›

For Darwinists There is No Presenting Both Sides in Intelligent Design Debate

For Darwinists There is No Presenting Both Sides in Intelligent Design Debate It’s okay for Hector Avalos to teach a class that specifically denounces intelligent design, but it isn’t okay for Tom Ingebritsent to teach a class that presents intelligent design and evolution impartially. This is supposed to be free and open debate? Read the rest at Evolution News & Views, www.scienceandculture.com. Read More ›

Rewriting History: Museum Fails to Disclose Own Role in Social Darwinism

Rewriting History: Museum Fails to Disclose Own Role in Social Darwinism The Museum's current exhibit glancingly mentions eugenics as an aberration, but this so-called aberration was supported by most of America’s elite universities and scientists for several decades. In 1932, for example, the AMNH itself played official host for a scientific meeting titled the "Third International Congress of Eugenics," and in conjunction with that meeting the Museum mounted an extensive public exhibition uncritically extolling the "science" of eugenics (much in the same way the current exhibit uncritically extolls neo-Darwinism). Read the rest at Evolution News & Views, www.scienceandculture.com. Read More ›

Nature Magazines’s Choice Blogger Has Heaps of Fun with the Crucifixion

Nature Magazines's Choice Blogger Has Heaps of Fun with the Crucifixion The media endlessly inspect the religious affiliations of Darwin critics, of course, supposedly because a scientist's religious views can be used to discount his scientific views. But, in contrast, they do not show us the views of the proselytizing atheists who host so many of the Darwinist organizations and websites, leading so much of the the Darwinist campaign against ID. Read the rest at Evolution News & Views, www.scienceandculture.com. Read More ›

NYT Story Misinforms on Intelligent Design and Templeton

he New York Times published a letter from the president of Discovery Institute, Bruce Chapman, correcting Laurie Goodstein’s piece “Intelligent Design Might Be Meeting Its Maker.” In addition to the misinformation Chapman notes, the story also passed along an error concerning the Templeton Foundation. Read More ›

Nature Magazine Promotes Darwinist who Favors Using Brass Knuckles on ID Proponents

Nature Magazine Promotes Darwinist who Favors Using Brass Knuckles on ID Proponents Nature magazine is promoting rabid ID critic PZ Myers as a science blog guru. This is the Myers who wrote about ID proponents on his blog: " I say, screw the polite words and careful rhetoric. It¹s time for scientists to break out the steel-toed boots and brass knuckles, and get out there and hammer on the lunatics and idiots." Read the rest at Evolution News & Views, www.scienceandculture.com Read More ›

MSNBC does creditable review of students’ anxieties over evolution

This is my second post in 2 days praising media articles which get this issue right. Let there be no mistake: the Evolution News & Views blog is not a “media complaints desk.” It’s a place for objective analysis–and we just try to call the balls and the strikes as we see them! MSNBC’s Current Magazine article by Victoria Bosch (“Monkey Business“), manages to objectively discuss the question of how doubters of Darwin are treated in college science classes. The article sensitively talks about how students who are skeptical of Darwinism cope with the issue. It was also gratifying that Niall Shanks at Wichita State professes to require only that students simply understand–not fully endorse–Darwinian evolution. Not only is it Read More ›

Excellent Pieces in The New Republic and The New Criterion take aim at Scientism

The New Republic and The New Criterion have excellent pieces discussing the debate over Darwin. The former explains how Darwinism has become a brand of scientism in the eyes of many leading proponents. The latter takes aim at the science of Darwinism itself, comparing it to a dogmatic faith which makes claims beyond what is warranted from the evidence. Monkey and Morals In Monkey and Morals, Gertrude Himmelfarb, the distinguished professor emeritus of history at City University (N.Y.), explains that some Darwinists such as E. O. Wilson and James Watson have an anti-religious agenda in their Darwinian advocacy. Himmelfarb recognizes, however, that some proponents of intelligent design approach this issue with scientific objections to evolution: “Yet others, themselves scientists, insist Read More ›

© Discovery Institute