Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
hand-of-linical-research-laboratory-technician-with-sample-o-829733480-stockpack-adobestock
Hand of linical research laboratory technician with sample of cancer cells with typical pink colored cells for microscopic analysis. Cancer research, new drug development.
Image Credit: Ricardo MzF .com - Adobe Stock
Latest

Cancer: Icon of Evolution?

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Medicine
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

Evolution theory has its famed icons — peppered moths, Darwin’s finches, Haeckel’s embryos, Miller-Urey… (See Jonathan Wells’s book Icons of Evolution for more.) Joshua Swamidass is a Washington University computational biologist, theistic evolutionist, and ID critic who has strained to add a new icon to the list: cancer.

He’s got four arguments for why the dreaded disease demonstrates the innovative powers of Darwinian evolution, powers that advocates of intelligent design question. In a previous ID the Future podcast, biologist Ann Gauger talked with Sarah Chaffee about the first two of Dr. Swamidass’s arguments. In a new episode they discuss the final two, focusing on convergence and neutral theory.

No, really, Swamidass is serious. Cancer the destroyer shows the creative potency of unguided evolutionary mechanisms. This has actually been the subject of intense discussion over at the BioLogos website for a month now, with a 183 posts in a thread on their Open Forum page. Quite remarkable.

Is Cancer Evolution an Intelligent Design Killer? Pt 2

951
Ann Gauger
October 12, 2016
On this episode of ID the Future, Ann Gauger answers Dr. S. Joshua Swamidass’ arguments against design. Here, she addresses his points that cancer “regularly exhibits convergence at a molecular level” and “all the mathematical machinery of neutral theory works so well.”

© Discovery Institute