Charnia-masoni Type post Author David Coppedge Date May 25, 2025 CategoriesArchaeologyEvolutionPaleontology Tagged , Anomalocaris, Associated Press, Barbara Wagstaff, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian Period, Charnia, Cornelius Hunter, Current Biology, Devonian Period, Flinders University, Fractofusus, Günter Bechly, Joe Moysiuk, John Long, Journal of the Geological Society, Justin Jackson, Live Science, mammoth, Marcin Ambrozik, Modura, Nature Communications, New Scientist, Per Ahlberg, radiodont, Royal Ontario Museum, Royal Society Open Science, Saint James, The Conversation, tiktaalik, true cross, University of Melbourne, Vera Korasidis Fossils as Magical Darwin Relics David Coppedge May 25, 2025 Archaeology, Evolution, Paleontology 12 Fossils can be handled in the present, but how they are used by evolutionists in stories of history resembles the practices of overeager medieval churchmen. Read More ›
Aerial_view_of_dunefield,_White_Sands_National_Park,_New_Mexico,_United_States Type post Date November 3, 2021 CategoriesEvolutionPaleontology Tagged , Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, Charles Darwin, evolution, New Scientist, New World monkeys, Peru, PNAS, radiodont, rafting, Royal Society Open Science, Science (journal), The Conversation, Titanokorys gainesi, University of Oxford, Utah Fossil Follies from Around the Science Literature Science and Culture November 3, 2021 Evolution, Paleontology 8 Evolutionary anthropologists will have to drastically revise the timeline of the first human arrivals in North America. Read More ›
AS10-29-4324 Type post Date September 20, 2018 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , __k-review, Anomalocaris, Burgess Shale, Cambrian animals, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, Charles Darwin, Current Biology, Ediacaran animals, Great Ordovician Biodiversification, jello, Jennifer Hoyal Cuthill, paleobiology, radiodont, Stephen Meyer, The Conversation, University of Oxford More Excuses for Cambrian Non-Evolution Science and Culture September 20, 2018 Evolution, Intelligent Design 7 A new statistical study of impacts on the moon concludes that the appearance of an increase was an artifact of biased sampling. Read More ›