Long-Story Type post Author Casey Luskin Date March 28, 2024 CategoriesBiologyEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , BioEssays, biologists, Carmen Sapienza, Columbia University, DNA, ENCODE, evolution, evolutionary biologists, Forrest Mims, Francis Crick, Genome Biology and Evolution, genomes, intelligent design, John Bodnar, John Mattick, Jonathan Wells, Journal of Human Evolution, junk DNA, Laurence Moran, Living with Darwin, Long Story Short, Nature (journal), Nature Methods, Oxford University Press, paradigm shift, Philip Kitcher, predictions, Richard Dawkins, Scientific American, Taylor & Francis, The Greatest Show on Earth, University of Toronto, W. Ford Doolittle, What’s in Your Genome, William A. Dembski New Long Story Video Tackles “A Battle of Predictions: Junk DNA” Casey Luskin March 28, 2024 Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design 10 Something happened in 2012 that changed the entire debate in favor of the ID-based prediction that DNA would be largely functional. Read More ›
knee Type post Author Brian Miller Date August 27, 2021 CategoriesEvolutionIntelligent Design Tagged , "poor design", bioinformatics, biological structures, biologists, biosphere, Dan Graur, ENCODE, engineers, evolution, fitness landscape, human body, Human Errors, human genome, junk DNA, knee, Living with Darwin, Nathan Lents, optimality, pelvis, Philip Kitcher, scientific materialism, teleology, whales, Wikipedia Why Systems Biologists Now Assume Life Is Optimally Designed Brian Miller August 27, 2021 Evolution, Intelligent Design 7 Purported examples of poor design usually represent opinions resulting from armchair critics’ limited understanding of the technical literature. Read More ›
