jonathan wells

The National Sciences Teachers Association is promoting a film intended to be shown to students and highlighted by materialistic language.

We were very skeptical of an initial report in Nature claiming that evolution was being purged from textbooks at the insistence of creationists.

I never quite pictured the context in which I’d get to say it, but Charles Darwin, a brave and honest man even if he was wrong, deserves better.

Readers who expect a sharp clash of swords will be disappointed. In fact, some might wonder what disagreement, if any, exists between us.

There’s something hallucinatory about this fixation on a single pitiable and tattered insect.

“In spite of intensive and long continued efforts, breeders have failed to give the world blue roses and black tulips.”

From the very beginning, Discovery Institute publicly opposed Dover’s attempt to put ID in its curriculum.

Doug Axe writes about luciferase, an evocatively named enzyme that makes fireflies glow while also pointing to one test, among others, that Darwinism fails.

If the religious beliefs of ID proponents disqualify them from rational dialogue in the scientific arena, surely Saunders’s atheism and anti-religious biases disqualify him.

Organisms are wholes and cannot be thought of as assembled in machine-like fashion.

The GULO pseudogene may or may not turn out to harbor some sort of function.

Far more than biology has been willing to admit, animal body plans and other features of life are determined by information sources that lie outside of DNA itself.