jonathan wells

There’s no substitute — no book, journal or other website provides the service we do.

Five months ago, we showed that Bateman’s whiz-bang mathematical theory of sexual selection had been essentially falsified.

An email correspondent says that criticizing Darwinian “evolution” and “evolutionists” is wrong-headed; not because he is a Darwinist himself.

The notion that Haeckel’s drawings were fraudulent or fake did not originate with proponents of intelligent design.

The basic problem is that their scientific argument is so badly outdated.

The Darwinist bloggers are defending a ragged flag on a rapidly shrinking ice floe, insisting that the vast ocean around them is nothing to worry about.

An article in Science by Elizabeth Pennisi pulls no punches and offers no apology for making it unambiguous how big the ENCODE results really are.

A stunning vindication of intelligent design’s prediction that the genome, far from being cluttered with functionless garbage, will turn out to have mass functionality.

What exactly is a species? Good question! Glad you asked.

While it is certainly true that function has not yet been identified for the majority of the genome, there is no reason to think the current trend — of finding new, previously unsuspected functionality — will not continue.

Paleoanthropology continues to impress with its willingness to draw the most far-reaching conclusions from the most pathetically minute evidence.