jonathan wells

Before Pigliucci even begins his analysis, we see the kind of rhetorical attacks that are typical of evolution-defenders.

Papers like this show that when freed from the “central dogmas” of neo-Darwinian evolution, a theory of intelligent design can open up promising and fruitful avenues of research and thinking.

Karl Giberson wants us to think that true tails are some kind of a regression to an earlier form.

The evolutionary notion of human “tails” is not only mistaken. It is also medically harmful.

This year’s event featured Discovery Institute fellows Michael Behe, William Dembski, Douglas Axe, John West and others, including Vern Poythress from Westminster Theological Seminary.

In June 1999, Paul Nelson and I flew to Kunming in southern China to attend an International Symposium on The Origins of Animal Body Plans and Their Fossil Record.

In February 1999, I had arranged for a talk at the University of Washington for Jun-Yuan Chen, a Chinese paleontologist who was an acknowledged expert on the Cambrian explosion.

Even when you try to disregard the evidence for design in nature, it nevertheless speaks for itself.

A visitor to Stephen Meyer’s Facebook page asked about an article by theistic evolutionist biologist Dennis Venema.

Biological Information: New Perspectives contains contributions from prominent proponents of intelligent design, such as Behe, Dembski, Wells, Axe, Gauger, and others.

It doesn’t happen for free. Don’t forget. Contribute now. Thank you!

If you could pose any question to Dr. Dawkins, what would it be? Let me know your answers.