jonathan wells

Thomas Kuhn argued from the history of science that reigning scientific paradigms do not give way gently and rationally before new and conflicting evidence.

Does modern evolutionary theory guide medicine’s response to COVID-19? Not when you consider that most of the major treatments being used and pursued actually preceded Darwin.

Design predictions rise as evolutionary assumptions fall. The junk DNA myth is, for all practical purposes, falsified.

Dr. Wells speaks on embryo development and the current mystery of ontogenetic development.

What Dr. Swamidass has going for him is primarily a quirk of semantics.

Dr. Wells shares his favorite endorsement, discusses evolutionist Jerry Coyne’s “review” (Coyne admittedly didn’t read the book), and describes a spoof review.

Darwinism is quite a theory. Everything and anything confirms it.

How evidence is interpreted is wrenched into line with the ideology. And this is what we mean by “zombie science.”

With his own sly humor, Dr. Wells points out some scientific problems with regarding Darwin’s Tree as unassailable fact.

Three massive acts of exquisitely complex re-engineering would be required, far beyond the reach of unguided natural processes.

In his new book, Jonathan Wells asks a simple question: If the icons of evolution were just innocent textbook errors, why do so many of them still persist?

The day’s science headlines include a sensational announcement that our ancestors separated from apes not in Africa as previously thought, but in Eastern Europe.