Convergence

The origin of the ingeniously intricate long necks in sauropod dinosaurs has been postulated to have arisen more than 35 times independently.

How much confidence should we really place in dubious fossil evidence when it is boldly claimed to prove Darwinian evolution as a fact?

“Evolution of novel genes”? Isn’t that the question at hand? Where do novel genes come from?

Even as a paleontologist I admit that calling this a real scientific discipline seems like an insult to sciences like physics or chemistry or molecular biology.

Is this what Darwinism would predict? Of course not! Is it instead what intelligent design theory would predict? Indeed it is.

Tracing the development of science over two millennia, the exhibition challenges a popular misconception about the relationship between the Bible and science.

So, is every thing OK with Darwinism after all? No so fast. Actually, there are some problems that do not square well with a Darwinian scenario.

Elephant shrews are sometimes considered to be living fossils, and their origin is believed to go back 57.5 million years in the Paleocene.

Should we dare to consider the possibility that something is wrong with the Darwinist assumptions? Heaven forbid!

The formulation “crazy stuff” of course implicitly suggests that this is a pseudo-problem invented by evil and stupid creationists.

Primates not only appeared suddenly, but their different subgroups of lemurs, tarsier, and simians all appeared at about the same time.

A lot of nonsense gets published in peer-reviewed journals and it needs expertise to separate the wheat from the chaff. Farina lacks any expertise to do this.