Convergence

True skeptics should question everything, and not just everything apart from Darwinism and materialism.

In spite of all the scientific efforts by Darwinists, the origin of complete metamorphosis in holometabolan insects remains an unsolved mystery.

Is mainstream evolutionary theory compatible with a biology-based argument for intelligent design? Theologian Rope Kojonen believes that it is.

Of course, a critic might worry that Kojonen’s model violates Ockham’s razor. Why posit two explanations when only one will do?

Surprised at the ability of mammals to thrive at high altitudes, some evolutionists are looking to Darwinian theory for answers.

A major study looks for evolution, but finds huge disparities, stasis, gaps, periodic explosions, and miracles of emergence held together with imagination.

The preeminence of design in nature and the utility of mimicking natural designs is a concept championed by the intelligent design community.

Forget all the pop science ballyhoo, and if you should not trust my word, just check the provided primary sources.

Doolittle predicts, from an evolutionary framework, that jawless vertebrates would have a simpler blood clotting cascade than the human system.

The coagulation cascade cannot evolve unless there is simultaneously a mechanism in hand for controlling it. Both would have to arise at the same time.

“The atmosphere lets through just the light we need,” says Denton, “and the sun puts out just the light we need. It’s a remarkable coincidence.”

We regard Kojonen’s model as nuanced, erudite, and fair-minded. It is a model of fine scholarship and deserves serious attention.