It's surely not a coincidence that this season in science-journal publishing we've seen a variety of attempts to solve the enigma that Stephen Meyer describes in his new book, Darwin's Doubt.
Read More ›
An otherwise scientifically sound paper might not be cited for reasons that are political, not scientific. In the intelligent-design movement, we've seen this many times.
Read More ›
According to Charles Marshall, I argue "that paleontologists are unable to explain the Cambrian explosion, thus opening the door to the possibility of a designer's intervention."
Read More ›
It would be hard to think of an American journalist who writes as capably as Booker does about the failures of Darwinism's beguiling fable.
Read More ›
