Darwinists today hate this kind of story because they don't want the racism that Darwin offered analytically in The Descent of Man to implicate him in the crimes that followed.
Read More ›
A theory like Darwin's that purports to explain all of nature and of life itself cannot be separated from the metaphysical commitments of its founder.
Read More ›
The ID field is more than prepared to grant a hearing to scientific agnosticism whereas Darwinian orthodoxy demands immediate capitulation.
Read More ›
Meredith, a pathologist who teaches literature courses at the University of Chicago, largely dispenses with the science, instead subjecting ID to a critique as theology.
Read More ›
Before vision reaches the brain, retinal cells massage it with multi-step image processing operations. That's where some of the "magic happens," say neuroscientists.
Read More ›
I thought I would excerpt here the section (pp. 392-398) from Darwin's Doubt in which Meyer explains Asher's main objection and responds to it.
Read More ›