Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Giant_Panda_Eating
Photo credit: Chen Wu from Shanghai, China, CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.
Latest

Evolved or Engineered? A Geneticist Evaluates the Panda’s Thumb

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

In 1980, influential paleontologist and evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould wrote that “we can know that evolution has happened by the imperfections and oddities that life shows.” But is that true? And what if we take a closer look at those assumed evolutionary oddities and see instead evidence of engineered elegance? On a new episode of ID the Future, I welcome retired geneticist Dr. Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig to the podcast to discuss his new paper reviewing the debate over the panda’s thumb. 

Giant pandas have an elongated wrist bone, the radial sesamoid, that allows them to handle and eat bamboo with great dexterity. Some claim it’s an imperfectly and inefficiently formed structure that is clear evidence of evolutionary processes at work. Others call it one of the most extraordinary manipulation systems in the mammalian world and clear evidence of engineering. So which is it? That’s the topic of our conversation today.

Optimal Design

Evolutionary biologists are trained to view organisms as products of a bottom-up, unguided process. So we really shouldn’t be surprised when they refer to innovations like the panda’s thumb as “clumsy,” “suboptimal,” “highly inefficient,” and “a crude structure.” It’s the best natural selection could do, after all. But what if biologists were trained in the principles of engineering? A deep understanding of the principles that govern the design of complex systems would give biologists a very different perspective. Dr. Lönnig discusses the work of bio-engineer Dr. Stuart Burgess, for example, who has worked on complex mechanical systems like Olympic bicycles and rockets. Burgess has also studied aspects of organismal form and found examples of optimal design. Says Burgess: “As for the Panda’s thumb, it is of course an excellent design for the design objectives.” 

Download the podcast or listen to it here. This is Part 1 of a two-part discussion. Look for Part 2 next!

Dig Deeper

Andrew McDiarmid

Director of Podcasting and Senior Fellow
Andrew McDiarmid is Director of Podcasting and a Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute. He is also a contributing writer to Mind Matters. He produces ID The Future, a podcast from the Center for Science & Culture that presents the case, research, and implications of intelligent design and explores the debate over evolution. He writes and speaks regularly on the impact of technology on human living. His work has appeared in numerous publications, including the New York Post, Houston Chronicle, The Daily Wire, San Francisco Chronicle, Real Clear Politics, Newsmax, The American Spectator, The Federalist, Technoskeptic Magazine, and elsewhere. In addition to his roles at Discovery Institute, he promotes his homeland as host of the Scottish culture and music podcast Simply Scottish. Andrew holds an MA in Teaching from Seattle Pacific University and a BA in English/Creative Writing from the University of Washington.
Benefiting from Science & Culture Today?
Support the Center for Science and Culture and ensure that we can continue to publish counter-cultural commentary and original reporting and analysis on scientific research, evolution, neuroscience, bioethics, and intelligent design.

© Discovery Institute