jonathan wells

Proponents of the ruling theory tell us that we are all undoubtedly intelligent enough to fully grasp their theory, as long as we concur with it.

Darwinist Jerry Coyne misunderstands design science. Intelligent design is two scientific inferences.

Darwin still has some cachet among design advocates. In this I differ from some of my friends and colleagues.

A little-known fact about intelligent design is that the majority of it scientists already perform their work alongside colleagues with differing views.

In the past couple of days, we’ve documented upsets in conventional evolutionary thinking. Here’s a third.

He describes an interview with evolutionist William Hamilton, who developed the theory of kin selection.

Darwin’s atheists brandished a “petition” to ban teaching evolution as evidence of what to anticipate under a Trump Administration.

Instead of addressing, or even accurately representing, Meyer’s main argument for intelligent design, Farrell devotes a significant portion of his review to criticizing the book for the alleged misuse of an ellipsis.

I’ve seen this so many times that I’ve come to think of it as a syndrome, a characteristic if enigmatic pattern.

This summer, we saw how Discover Magazine blogger Carl Zimmer tried to manufacture a controversy and score some points for the Darwin side in the evolution debate.

CSC Fellow Cornelius Hunter gives us the big picture view of the recent dustup with John Farrell at Forbes as “an interesting example of how evolutionary thinking is handed down and … » Go