jonathan wells

Dr. Wells explains how these codes impact the debate over neo-Darwinism (a big problem) and intelligent design (providing powerful confirmation).

If the term “denial” applies to either side in this controversy, it is certainly to the Darwinists rather than their critics.

Pigliucci closes by acknowledging “the abysmal state of the textbook publishing industry.”

A fraud is a fraud regardless of who discovered it, and if evolutionary biologists discovered it, then good for them.

Is there functional information in DNA outside of the genes? And how about epigenetic information that exists outside of DNA entirely?

As Boze and Wells discuss, the cell is in a sense both a computer and the operator of the computer.

In a really fascinating new book, Alan Feduccia favorably cites Dr. Wells’s Icons of Evolution, at length.

Dr. Wells literally wrote the book on the Myth of Junk DNA. He answered some questions on the recent news from ENCODE.

He has been vindicated by the leading scientific publications in the world.

In a series of clever experiments, the researchers used native South Korean moths that employ camouflage when resting on their native habitat, pine trees.

Recently published literature has overwhelmingly confirmed Jonathan Wells’ thesis in The Myth of Junk DNA, refuting the ID critics who still cling to the neo-Darwinian story.

Paul Nelson and Jonathan Wells, both members of the Society for Developmental Biology, will be presenting posters designed (pun intended) to provoke discussion.