jonathan wells

When I spoke to Jonathan about the cost he paid in standing for his principles, he remarked that his decision to do prison time contained a blessing.

We are receiving many emails expressing appreciation of him as a man, a thinker, a scientific investigator, a writer, a mentor, and a friend.

His work resulted in forcing textbook publishers to correct their own work, a task they and their media enablers bitterly resented.

How strong is the evidence for Darwinian evolution? What are the limits of the Darwinian mechanism?

The notion that knowledge must reject mind as a casual factor in origins studies is a materialist presumption — not science.

How will our culture look back on this period of madness, once we get beyond it, as one hopes we will do soon?

Dr. Wells dissects some recent hype over Darwin’s finches, an icon of evolution that just won’t stay buried.

Darwin anticipated “innumerable transitions” in the fossil record, but such a rainbow of transitional forms has never been found.

Wells encourages more than a modest dose of skepticism, and gives the example of the supposed “backward wiring of the vertebrate eye” as a case in point.

Dr. Wells explaining why DNA information in an embryo can only do its job in the context of spatial information that is specified independently of it.

Thomas Kuhn argued from the history of science that reigning scientific paradigms do not give way gently and rationally before new and conflicting evidence.

Does modern evolutionary theory guide medicine’s response to COVID-19? Not when you consider that most of the major treatments being used and pursued actually preceded Darwin.