Tag: phenotype | Page 2 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
June 3, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, BioLogos, bones, Brian Miller, Cell (journal), common design, Darrel Falk, Darwin's Doubt, evolution, front-loaded design, Gerd Müller, homologous features, homology, intelligent design, mutations, Neil Shubin, Neo-Darwinism, novelty, phenotype, Return of the God Hypothesis, zebrafish}

Revealing Darrel Falk’s Overstatements about Limb Bones in Fish Fins

_{Casey Luskin
June 3, 2021

Evolution, Intelligent Design

17}

The interpretation of the results as showing “latent” genetic capabilities has teleological overtones that are compatible with intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

Date
April 14, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, Alan Feduccia, Archaeopteryx, birds, cladistics, Darwinian theory, dinosaurs, Dollo’s Law, Eocene, Ernst Mayr, evolutionary theory, genetic code, gradualism, Irreducible Complexity, M.-P. Schützenberger, macromutations, mutations, nucleotides, paleontology, phenotype, saltations, Science (journal), wings}

Ten Reasons Why Birds Are Not Living Dinosaurs

_{Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig
April 14, 2021

Evolution, Genetics

5}

Natural selection can explain “the survival of the fittest but not the arrival of the fittest.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Richard Sternberg

Date
April 3, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, __k-review, axioms, chromosomes, DNA, Drosophila melanogaster, Francis Crick, fruit flies, junk DNA, Leslie Orgel, nucleus, organism, phenotype, Richard Dawkins, RNA, The Selfish Gene, transposable elements, W. Ford Doolittle, Y chromosome}

The “Why” of the Fly “Y”: Reflections on “Junk” DNA

_{Richard Sternberg
April 3, 2020

Evolution, Genetics

7}

Let us give some thought to the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster, that engaging fly which is the bond-servant of genetics. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
March 13, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, Ann Gauger, bacteria, bioengineering, Charles Darwin, Charles Thaxton, corn, Craig Venter, CRISPR-Cas9, design filter, Design Inference, DNA, Dogs, Douglas Axe, Galápagos Islands, genotype, intelligent design, maize, Mars rover, natural, Nature (journal), No Free Lunch, Paul Nelson, phenotype, Roger Olsen, Technion, The Design Revolution, The Mystery of Life’s Origin, Walter Bradley, William A. Dembski, wolves}

Blurring the Line Between Natural and Artificial

_{Science and Culture
March 13, 2020

Intelligent Design

9}

As technology mimics nature, at what point might future investigators be unsure about natural versus intelligent causes? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Granville Sewell

Date
October 30, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Genetics
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __edited, A Biologist’s View, Alexander Tsiaras, Artificial Selection, birth, conception, development, duplication errors, evolution, foresight, geneticists, genotype, Giuseppe Sermonti, growth, In the Beginning, intelligent design, Jean Rostand, Lehigh University, Michael Behe, natural selection, Oxford University, phenotype, Yale University}

The “Three Cardinal Problems of Biology”

_{Granville Sewell
October 30, 2019

Biology, Evolution, Genetics, Origin of Life

6}

We still are not close to designing any self-replicating machine. That is still pure science fiction. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
May 2, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, adaptation, amino acids, APOB, cholesterol, Darwin Devolves, diet, disease, evolution, function, genes, genome, genotype, mice, Michael Behe, mutations, phenotype, polar bears, PolyPhen-2, proteins, Shiping Liu}

Remind Me Again Why We Picked Polar Bears?

_{Ann Gauger
May 2, 2019

Evolution

16}

The core difficulty for some scientists who read Michael Behe’s book is also the key idea at its heart. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
April 8, 2019

Categories
Biology
Cosmology
Evolution
Linguistics
Metaphysics
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, "survival of the fittest", act, adaptation, Albert Einstein, Aristotle, Darwinian theory, Darwinists, Erwin Schrödinger, form, genotype, Isaac Newton, matter, phenotype, potency, Prime Mover, quantum mechanics, theory, Thomas Aquinas, Universal Darwinism}

Aristotle and Universal Darwinism

_{Michael Egnor
April 8, 2019

Biology, Cosmology, Evolution, Linguistics, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Physics, Social Sciences

6}

The greatest engine of atheism in modern times — Darwin’s theory — is nothing more than a bastardization of the strongest philosophical argument for God’s existence. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 26, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, alcohol, biological information, Darwin's Doubt, Drosophila melanogaster, enzyme, evolution, evolutionary biology, fitness, fruit, genes, genotype, Günter Bechly, intelligent design, Nature Ecology and Evolution, phenotype, proteins, Stephen Meyer, word salad}

On the Evolutionary Origin of New Genes, Stephen Meyer Is Vindicated Again

_{Casey Luskin
October 26, 2018

Evolution

9}

Most studies simply infer or invent some story about the evolution of a gene without any experimental tests. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
November 11, 2011

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Carl Sagan, Darwinists, extraterrestrials, genotype, phenotype, Richard Dawkins, SETI}

The Religion Behind SETI

_{Science and Culture
November 11, 2011

Faith & Science

1}

Carl Sagan "believed in superior beings in space, creatures so intelligent, so powerful, as to resemble gods." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
November 10, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwinists, genotype, God, Immanuel Kant, phenotype, theistic evolution, theology}

With a Startling Candor, Oxford Scientist Admits a Gaping Hole in Evolutionary Theory

_{Science and Culture
November 10, 2011

Evolution

1}

This just in: A rather basic question fundamental to any evolutionary account of life’s development — how “genotypes generate phenotypes,” in other words how genes build an individual creature — remains totally obscure to science.