Tag: David Berlinski | Page 12 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 30, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Physics
Tagged
, __k-review, alchemy, atheism, Big Bang, Christopher Hitchens, Darwinism, David Berlinski, evolution, Fox News, Jeffrey Shallit, Jerry Coyne, Karl Marx, Lawrence Krauss, New Atheists, Paris, progressivism, religion, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, scientism, second of law thermodynamics, The Devil’s Delusion}

With Mark Levin on Fox News, David Berlinski Talks “Evolution, Science, Progressivism”

_{David Klinghoffer
April 30, 2018

Evolution, Faith & Science, Physics

7}

I think it’s the first time I’ve heard a discussion of the second of law thermodynamics on cable TV. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
April 16, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, conservatism, David Berlinski, David Klinghoffer, Discovery Institute, evolution, Firing Line, Hoover Institution, intelligent design, Irving Kristol, John West, Jonah Goldberg, Michael Behe, National Review, Phillip E. Johnson, Politics}

Jonah Goldberg, William F. Buckley Jr., and Evolution

_{Science & Culture
April 16, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

Conceding deep philosophical and scientific premises is one common reason that conservatives lose important arguments. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
March 29, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Science Education
Tagged
, __k-review, "teach the controversy", atheism, critical thinking, Darwinian theory, David Berlinski, Discovery Institute, education, evolution, intelligent design, irony, mutations, Neil deGrasse Tyson, probability, science, skepticism, stochastic processes}

Calling for Critical Thinking on Science, Darwinist Cites David Berlinski

_{Sarah Chaffee
March 29, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science Education

5}

Equipping people to be “their own science referees” is a large part of the mission of the intelligent design movement. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 12, 2018

Categories
Bioethics
Evolution
Fine-tuning
Philosophy
Tagged
, __k-review, Aristotle, Bible, conservatism, Darwinism, David Berlinski, Discovery Institute, DNA, intelligent design, John West, Michael Behe, molecular machines, Phillip E. Johnson, William F. Buckley Jr.}

“Gatling Gun in the Living Room”: Two Missed Chances to Defend a Humane View on Bioethics

_{David Klinghoffer
January 12, 2018

Bioethics, Evolution, Fine-tuning, Philosophy

6}

John West reviews two books by conservatives, Yuval Levin and Eric Cohen, who “seem more interested in criticizing their fellow conservatives who challenge Darwinism than in criticizing Darwinism itself.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Rachel Adams

Date
December 11, 2017

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Barnes & Noble, books, Christmas, Darwin's House of Cards, David Berlinski, Douglas Axe, Fire-Maker, From Darwin to Hitler, gifts, Hitler’s Religion, Jonathan Wells, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Privileged Species, Revolutionary: Michael Behe and the Mystery of Molecular Machines (film), Richard Weikart, shopping, Stephen Meyer, The Deniable Darwin, The Wonder of Water, Tom Bethell, Undeniable (book), Zombie Science (book)}

Christmas Shopping? We’ve Got You Covered!

_{Rachel Adams
December 11, 2017

Intelligent Design

4}

Christmas season is upon us, and there’s no need to procrastinate on the Christmas lists. Who are you shopping for this year? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 1, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __k-review, A. N. Wilson, Charles Darwin, Charles Darwin: Victorian Mythmaker, David Berlinski, Douglas Axe, eugenics, evolution, Galápagos finches, history, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, On the Origin of Species, Stephen Meyer, The Descent of Man, The Kingdom of Speech, Thomas Nagel, Tom Bethell, Tom Wolfe}

A.N. Wilson in The Times – Against Darwinist Absolutism

_{David Klinghoffer
September 1, 2017

Evolution, Science Reporting

6}

Wilson's forthcoming biography appears to be part of a larger rethink of evolution that is bubbling away in a variety of areas. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
March 30, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Center for Science and Culture, David Berlinski, evolution, Firing Line, Michael Behe, National Review, Revolutionary: Michael Behe and the Mystery of Molecular Machines (film), Stephen Meyer, William F. Buckley Jr.}

How the Evolution Debate Devolved

_{David Klinghoffer
March 30, 2017

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science

4}

Darwinism is more "absolutist" and closed to discussion than ever. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
March 14, 2017

Categories
Culture
Intelligent Design
Mathematics
Science
Tagged
, __k-review, anthropic fine-tuning, Darwin, David Berlinski, Eugene Wigner, evolution, intelligent design, Neal Gillespie, pi}

How to Celebrate Pi Day? The Intelligent Design Way

_{Science & Culture
March 14, 2017

Culture, Intelligent Design, Mathematics, Science

4}

Math points to a reality beyond our physical realm, not entirely dissimilar to the way biology does. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 21, 2016

Categories
Intelligent Design
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __nedited, David Berlinski, film review, homelessness, John West, Lehigh University, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Scott Minnich, Seattle}

Revealing Michael Behe, Intelligent Design’s “Revolutionary” Biologist

_{David Klinghoffer
October 21, 2016

Intelligent Design, Science Reporting

6}

A lamentable aspect of Seattle street life reminds me a curious feature of the evolution debate. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 1, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, David Berlinski, science, Views}

The Heart of the Matter: Berlinski and Denton on the Issue that Lies Behind the Evolution Debate

_{David Klinghoffer
February 1, 2016

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

If you could drill through the layers of reason and assumption, to the heart of the dispute over Darwinism, what would it be? Read More ›