Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Topic

Big Bang

moonlight-1

Aquinas’ Third Way: An Analogy to Moonlight

Imagine that you are an astronomer on a world with one moon. It is always night on your world, and the moon is the only body in the sky. Read More ›
1280px-Jim_Peebles

Physics Nobel Prize Invites Snark from the Anti-ID Peanut Gallery

Insofar as Peebles’s work helps to strengthen the evidence for a cosmic beginning, it is actually part of the argument for intelligent design. Read More ›
1280px-Mel_nest_stack_of_books

Aquinas’ First Way and a Stack of Books

Nature is like a stack of books, sessile, until moved. Read More ›
Zeta-Ophiuchi-1

Between Sapientia and Scientia — Michael Aeschliman’s Profound Interpretation

Science, the dominant way of knowing of our age, now finds itself caught between a rock and (very) hard place. Read More ›
Human-Zoos 2

What’s at Stake in the Debate over Darwinism?

We know that Darwinian evolution has a long and sordid history of entanglement with issues of race, racism, and eugenics. Read More ›
Weikart Saunders

An “Impersonal Universe” and Its Consequences

Physicist Frank Tipler, as I noted earlier today, provocatively personalizes the Singularity, the beginning point or moment from which the universe burst forth. Read More ›
Frank Tipler 2

What — Or Who? — Is the Singularity?

I had thought of the Singularity as an event, to which the universe — physical reality — traces back at the moment of the Big Bang. Read More ›
The_Teacup_Galaxy_SDSS_1430

The Empty Heavens — Two Ways to Look at It

Adam Kirsch over the weekend had a thoughtful essay in the Wall Street Journal, meditating on the coming 50th anniversary of the first moon landing. Read More ›
Homo erectus pekinensis
racism
Image: An artist imagines Homo erectus pekinensis, by Cicero Moraes [CC BY-SA 4.0], via Wikimedia Commons.

Why Darwinism Can Never Separate Itself from Racism

You think if Darwinian theory had emerged not in the dark age of the 19th century but in our own woke era, it would be different? No, it wouldn’t. Read More ›

© Discovery Institute