Fossil friday

How do popularizers of Darwinism such as Richard Dawkins react? Unsurprisingly, they just ignore the evidence.

Could intelligent design better explain this weird feeding apparatus? Of course.

So, were strashilids a distinct order of parasitic insects or just aquatic flies?

What we do know is that it is definitely not our earliest ancestor. Another overhyped missing link bites the dust.

Let’s have a look at the newest edition of the Precambrian animal guessing game.

Natural selection is the great magician in evolutionary fantasy land, where it explains rapid change in explosive radiations as well as no change at all.

Why do we mostly hear only one side of the story in the media? I suppose we must be protected from dangerous questions that could come up.

All the just-so-stories of macroevolution are completely dispensable in real (experimental) biology.

To claim that such undefinable blobs in sandstone represent fossils of the oldest motile animals is massively overselling the evidence to say the least.

This would have been very interesting news to my friend and colleague Jonathan Wells, who had described many such cases in his ground-breaking books.

One of the strongest arguments in favor of Darwinian evolution gets more and more dismantled, which totally vindicates the critique by Michael Denton.

We may now add the mysterious Chitinozoa to this ever-growing list of products of the burst of biological creativity in the Early Cambrian.